Literature DB >> 21093359

Fat tissue alters quadriceps response to femoral nerve magnetic stimulation.

Katja Tomazin1, Samuel Verges, Nicolas Decorte, Alain Oulerich, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Guillaume Y Millet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigate the influence that inguinal fat has on maximal quadriceps response to femoral nerve magnetic stimulation.
METHODS: Vastus lateralis M-wave amplitude and quadriceps twitch peak torque were measured (i) in lean and overweight subjects and (ii) when slices of pig fat ranging from 2 to 18 mm in thickness were placed between the coil and the nerve.
RESULTS: In overweight group, the maximal response could not be elicited when intensity was ≤90% and ≤85% of maximal power for twitch torque and M-wave amplitude, respectively. The maximal response was obtained at 80% of maximal power in the lean group. Negative correlations between relative twitch torque changes and inguinal thickness were observed. Fat thickness altered quadriceps response at 14 mm and 8 mm in the lean and overweight groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The capacity of femoral nerve magnetic stimulation to deliver supramaximal stimulation is altered when fat thickness below the coil increases. SIGNIFICANCE: Special caution should be taken by clinicians when overweight or obese subjects are tested using femoral nerve magnetic stimulation.
Copyright © 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21093359     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  9 in total

1.  Magnetic versus electrical stimulation in the interpolation twitch technique of elbow flexors.

Authors:  Sofia I Lampropoulou; Alexander V Nowicky; Louise Marston
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Comparison of electrical nerve stimulation, electrical muscle stimulation and magnetic nerve stimulation to assess the neuromuscular function of the plantar flexor muscles.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; John Temesi; Guillaume Y Millet; Samuel Verges; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation for testing neuromuscular function: from sport to pathology.

Authors:  Guillaume Y Millet; Vincent Martin; Alain Martin; Samuel Vergès
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Quantification of Neuromuscular Fatigue: What Do We Do Wrong and Why?

Authors:  Nicolas Place; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Prediction of Force Recruitment of Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation From 3D Field Model of the Thigh.

Authors:  Stefan Goetz; Joerg Kammermann; Florian Helling; Thomas Weyh; Zhongxi Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 7.  Bedside voluntary and evoked forces evaluation in intensive care unit patients: a narrative review.

Authors:  Djahid Kennouche; Eric Luneau; Guillaume Y Millet; Julien Gondin; Thomas Lapole; Jérome Morel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Skinfold thickness affects the isometric knee extension torque evoked by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Flávia V A Medeiros; Amilton Vieira; Rodrigo L Carregaro; Martim Bottaro; Nicola A Maffiuletti; João L Q Durigan
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Fatigue in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Theoretical Framework and Implications For Real-Life Performance and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mathieu Gruet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.