Literature DB >> 17887996

Preoperative determinants of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A J Sheen1, S Asthana, A Al-Mukhtar, M Attia, G J Toogood.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to determine whether there are any clinical or biochemical predictors of common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: A prospective database of nearly 1000 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed under the care of a single surgeon with a standardised technique between 1999 and 2006, was analysed. Clinical presentation, ultrasound and immediate preoperative biochemical results as well as the operative cholangiogram findings were reviewed. Routine cholangiography was attempted in most patients and the primary outcome variable was the detection of bile duct stones. The data was analysed using chi-squared test for categorical variables. The significant variables on univariate analysis were further characterised to identify the independent predictors of bile duct stones using a logistic regression model (significance p < 0.05).
RESULTS: A total of 757 of 988 patients (77%) underwent cholangiography. Male-to-female ratio was 1 : 3 with a median age of 54 years (range: 17-93). Ten per cent of patients had bile duct stones identified on cholangiography. On univariate analysis, jaundice (p = 0.019), cholangitis (p < 0.001), alanine transaminase > 100 (p = 0.024), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 350 (p < 0.001) and CBD > 10 mm (p = 0.01) were significant markers for predicting bile duct stones. Bilirubin > 30 (x2 normal) was found not to be significant (p = 0.145). On a logistic regression model, ALP > 350 and/or cholangitis were found to be independent predictive factors of CBD stones (odds ratio 6.1).
CONCLUSIONS: If a policy of routine intra-operative cholangiography is not adopted, a history of cholangitis or a raised ALP immediately preoperatively should lead to a high suspicion of CBD stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17887996     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01469.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  P Sanjay; C Kulli; F M Polignano; I S Tait
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sanket Srinivasa; Tarik Sammour; Bernard McEntee; Nicola Davis; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  James Horwood; Fayaz Akbar; Katherine Davis; Richard Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of the use of intraoperative cholangiography; time to revisit our approach to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Eoin Donnellan; Jonathan Coulter; Cherian Mathew; Michelle Choynowski; Louise Flanagan; Magda Bucholc; Alison Johnston; Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-08-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.