Literature DB >> 24772321

Expression of ribonucleoside reductase subunit M1, but not excision repair cross-complementation group 1, is predictive in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with chemotherapy and radiation.

Mark Shilkrut1, Angela Wu2, Dafydd G Thomas2, Daniel A Hamstra3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic and predictive values of ribonucleoside reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. The expression of RRM1 and ERCC1 in pretreatment tumor samples of retrospectively identified patients was determined by immunohistochemical analysis. A total of 39 patients were included in this study; 49% were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 67% with concomitant chemoradiotherapy; 56% were treated with gemcitabine-based and 51% with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range, 11-50 months). Based on the immunohistochemical analysis, 44 and 32% of the tumors exhibited increased expression of RRM1 and ERCC1, respectively. The complete response (CR) and local recurrence rates following chemoradiotherapy were 79 and 21%, respectively. A low expression of RRM1 was associated with a higher rate of CR to chemoradiotherapy (95 vs. 57%, P=0.012); however, there was no such association with low ERCC1 expression (67 vs. 84%, P=0.39). RRM1 expression predicted an improved CR in patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (57 vs. 100%, P=0.036), but not in those treated with other agents (56 vs. 88%, P=0.29). ERCC1 expression was not found to be correlated with CR (67 vs. 84%, P=0.39), even when restricted to patients treated with platinum agents (71 vs. 75%, P=1.0). In the univariate analysis, RRM1 expression, but not ERCC1 expression, was identified as a prognostic marker for worse cancer-specific survival in all the patients and in those treated with gemcitabine-based regimens. No independent prognostic factor was identified in the multivariate model, which included tumor stage, vascular invasion, hydronephrosis and RRM1 status. Although these findings require further validation, they suggest that RRM1 may be a beneficial stratification variable for the selection of chemotherapy regimens for chemoradiotherapy, with patients with low RRM1 expression being considered suitable for gemcitabine treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; chemotherapy; excision repair cross-complementation group 1; prognostic marker; radiotherapy; ribonucleoside reductase subunit M1

Year:  2014        PMID: 24772321      PMCID: PMC3999124          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  32 in total

1.  Gene expression of ERCC1 as a novel prognostic marker in advanced bladder cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Bellmunt; L Paz-Ares; M Cuello; F L Cecere; S Albiol; V Guillem; E Gallardo; J Carles; P Mendez; J J de la Cruz; M Taron; R Rosell; J Baselga
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kyoung Ha Kim; In-Gu Do; Hyeong Su Kim; Myung Hee Chang; Hyo Song Kim; Hyun Jung Jun; Jieun Uhm; Seong Yoon Yi; Do Hyoung Lim; Sang Hoon Ji; Min Jae Park; Jeeyun Lee; Se Hoon Park; Ghee Young Kwon; Ho Yeong Lim
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 3.  Selective bladder preservation by trimodality therapy for patients with muscularis propria-invasive bladder cancer and who are cystectomy candidates--the Massachusetts General Hospital and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group experiences.

Authors:  William U Shipley; Anthony L Zietman; Donald S Kaufman; John J Coen; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  ERCC1 and RRM1 gene expressions but not EGFR are predictive of shorter survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine.

Authors:  P Ceppi; M Volante; S Novello; I Rapa; K D Danenberg; P V Danenberg; A Cambieri; G Selvaggi; S Saviozzi; R Calogero; M Papotti; G V Scagliotti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas D James; Syed A Hussain; Emma Hall; Peter Jenkins; Jean Tremlett; Christine Rawlings; Malcolm Crundwell; Bruce Sizer; Thiagarajan Sreenivasan; Carey Hendron; Rebecca Lewis; Rachel Waters; Robert A Huddart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Late pelvic toxicity after bladder-sparing therapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: RTOG 89-03, 95-06, 97-06, 99-06.

Authors:  Jason A Efstathiou; Kyounghwa Bae; William U Shipley; Donald S Kaufman; Michael P Hagan; Niall M Heney; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  David C Smith; Niklas J Mackler; Rodney L Dunn; Maha Hussain; David Wood; Cheryl T Lee; Martin Sanda; Ulka Vaishampayan; Daniel P Petrylak; David I Quinn; Kathleen Beekman; James E Montie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Current status of excision repair cross complementing-group 1 (ERCC1) in cancer.

Authors:  Lucy Gossage; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Preoperative radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Long term follow-up and prognostic factors for 338 patients.

Authors:  A Pollack; G K Zagars; C P Dinney; D A Swanson; A C von Eschenbach
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A Review of ERCC1 Gene in Bladder Cancer: Implications for Carcinogenesis and Resistance to Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Atsunari Kawashima; Hitoshi Takayama; Akira Tsujimura
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10-26
View more
  4 in total

1.  Predictive and Prognostic Value of Ribonucleotide Reductase Regulatory Subunit M1 and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) Treated with First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Platinum Combination Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Miso Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Eunsik Lee; Bhumsuk Keam; Tae Min Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Se-Hoon Lee; Kyung Chul Moon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoukos; Angeliki Andrikopoulou; Nikos Dedes; Flora Zagouri; Aristotelis Bamias; Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Is ERCC1 a prognostic biomarker for urothelial cancer following radical cystectomy? A long-term analysis.

Authors:  Mateusz Obarzanowski; Janusz Kopczynski; Jaroslaw Jaskulski; Antoni Domagala; Pawel Macek; Stanislaw Gozdz; Maciej Salagierski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-09-23

Review 4.  Predictive Value of Ercc1 and Xpd Polymorphisms for Clinical Outcomes of Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prisma-Compliant Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mao Qixing; Dong Gaochao; Xia Wenjie; Yin Rong; Jiang Feng; Xu Lin; Qiu Mantang; Chen Qiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.