Literature DB >> 21089773

Apparent absence of a proton beam dose rate effect and possible differences in RBE between Bragg peak and plateau.

Taeko Matsuura1, Yusuke Egashira, Teiji Nishio, Yoshitaka Matsumoto, Mami Wada, Sachiko Koike, Yoshiya Furusawa, Ryosuke Kohno, Shie Nishioka, Satoru Kameoka, Katsuya Tsuchihara, Mitsuhiko Kawashima, Takashi Ogino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Respiration-gated irradiation for a moving target requires a longer time to deliver single fraction in proton radiotherapy (PRT). Ultrahigh dose rate (UDR) proton beam, which is 10-100 times higher than that is used in current clinical practice, has been investigated to deliver daily dose in single breath hold duration. The purpose of this study is to investigate the survival curve and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of such an ultrahigh dose rate proton beam and their linear energy transfer (LET) dependence.
METHODS: HSG cells were irradiated by a spatially and temporally uniform proton beam at two different dose rates: 8 Gy/min (CDR, clinical dose rate) and 325 Gy/min (UDR, ultrahigh dose rate) at the Bragg peak and 1.75 (CDR) and 114 Gy/min (UDR) at the plateau. To study LET dependence, the cells were positioned at the Bragg peak, where the absorbed dose-averaged LET was 3.19 keV/microm, and at the plateau, where it was 0.56 keV/microm. After the cell exposure and colony assay, the measured data were fitted by the linear quadratic (LQ) model and the survival curves and RBE at 10% survival were compared.
RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the survival curves between the two proton dose rates. The ratio of the RBE for CDR/UDR was 0.98 +/- 0.04 at the Bragg peak and 0.96 +/- 0.06 at the plateau. On the other hand, Bragg peak/plateau RBE ratio was 1.15 +/- 0.05 for UDR and 1.18 +/- 0.07 for CDR.
CONCLUSIONS: Present RBE can be consistently used in treatment planning of PRT using ultrahigh dose rate radiation. Because a significant increase in RBE toward the Bragg peak was observed for both UDR and CDR, further evaluation of RBE enhancement toward the Bragg peak and beyond is required.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21089773     DOI: 10.1118/1.3490086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Biological effects in normal cells exposed to FLASH dose rate protons.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Veljko Grilj; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Performance Evaluation for Repair of HSGc-C5 Carcinoma Cell Using Geant4-DNA.

Authors:  Dousatsu Sakata; Masao Suzuki; Ryoichi Hirayama; Yasushi Abe; Masayuki Muramatsu; Shinji Sato; Oleg Belov; Ioanna Kyriakou; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Susanna Guatelli; Sebastien Incerti; Taku Inaniwa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Mitochondrial Damage Response and Fate of Normal Cells Exposed to FLASH Irradiation with Protons.

Authors:  Ziyang Guo; Manuela Buonanno; Andrew Harken; Guangming Zhou; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  Proton therapy radiation pneumonitis local dose-response in esophagus cancer patients.

Authors:  Alfredo E Echeverria; Matthew McCurdy; Richard Castillo; Vincent Bernard; Natalia Velez Ramos; William Buckley; Edward Castillo; Ping Liu; Josue Martinez; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The Importance and Clinical Implications of FLASH Ultra-High Dose-Rate Studies for Proton and Heavy Ion Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas W Colangelo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy.

Authors:  Alejandro Mazal; Yolanda Prezado; Carme Ares; Ludovic de Marzi; Annalisa Patriarca; Raymond Miralbell; Vincent Favaudon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Microdosimetric calculation of relative biological effectiveness for design of therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  Yuki Kase; Wataru Yamashita; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Kenta Takada; Takeji Sakae; Yoshiya Furusawa; Haruo Yamashita; Shigeyuki Murayama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Biophysical characterization of a relativistic proton beam for image-guided radiosurgery.

Authors:  Zhan Yu; Marie Vanstalle; Chiara La Tessa; Guo-Liang Jiang; Marco Durante
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Enhanced radiobiological effects at the distal end of a clinical proton beam: in vitro study.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Taeko Matsuura; Mami Wada; Yusuke Egashira; Teiji Nishio; Yoshiya Furusawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.