Literature DB >> 21088287

Single time point immune function assay (ImmuKnow) testing does not aid in the prediction of future opportunistic infections or acute rejection.

Janna Huskey1, Jane Gralla, Alexander C Wiseman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current assays and tests that are used to determine the degree of immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients are suboptimal. The ImmuKnow assay (Cylex), a measure of intracellular CD4+ T cell ATP release proposed as a means to quantify cell-mediated immunity in transplant recipients, could be considered as a potential tool to identify patients at risk for opportunistic infections (OI) or acute rejection (AR). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We retrospectively analyzed 1330 ImmuKnow assay values in 583 renal transplant recipients at a single center from 2004 to 2009 and correlated these values with episodes of OI and AR in the subsequent 90 days. Assay values were compared with a control population matched for age, gender, and time post-transplantation.
RESULTS: In patients with OI (n=94), there were no differences in prior mean assay values compared with matched controls (386 versus 417 ng/ml, P=0.24). In 47 patients with AR, again no differences were detected in prior assay results (390 versus 432 ng/ml, P=0.25) when compared with controls. "Low" values (≤225 ng/ml) lacked sensitivity and specificity as a predictive test for subsequent OI, as did "strong" (≥525 ng/ml) values as a predictive test for subsequent AR.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results fail to show an association between single time point ImmuKnow assay values and the subsequent development of an adverse event in the subsequent 90 days. The optimal use of the ImmuKnow assay in kidney transplantation has yet to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21088287      PMCID: PMC3052235          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04210510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  17 in total

Review 1.  Multiple pathways to allograft rejection.

Authors:  Alain Le Moine; Michel Goldman; Daniel Abramowicz
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Clinical and immunologic aspects of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ajda T Rowshani; Frederike J Bemelman; Ester M M van Leeuwen; René A W van Lier; Ineke J M ten Berge
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Assessing the risk of infection and rejection in Hispanic renal transplant recipients by means of an adenosine triphosphate release assay.

Authors:  R Cadillo-Chávez; Sally de Echegaray; E A Santiago-Delpín; A T Rodríguez-Trinidad; B Camacho-Carrazo; T Alfaro; M Saavedra-Pozo; L Carrasquillo; Z A González-Caraballo; L A Morales-Otero
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve: its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  K Mahalati; P Belitsky; I Sketris; K West; R Panek
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Assessing relative risks of infection and rejection: a meta-analysis using an immune function assay.

Authors:  Richard J Kowalski; Diane R Post; Roslyn B Mannon; Anthony Sebastian; Harlan I Wright; Gary Sigle; James Burdick; Kareem Abu Elmagd; Adriana Zeevi; Mayra Lopez-Cepero; John A Daller; H Albin Gritsch; Elaine F Reed; Johann Jonsson; Douglas Hawkins; Judith A Britz
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Immune cell function testing: an adjunct to therapeutic drug monitoring in transplant patient management.

Authors:  Richard Kowalski; Diane Post; Mary C Schneider; Judith Britz; Judy Thomas; Mark Deierhoi; Andrew Lobashevsky; Robert Redfield; Eugene Schweitzer; Alonso Heredia; Elise Reardon; Charles Davis; Carol Bentlejewski; John Fung; Ron Shapiro; Adriana Zeevi
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Cell mediated immunity (CMI) and post transplant viral infections--role of a functional immune assay to titrate immunosuppression.

Authors:  A Gautam; S A Fischer; A F Yango; R Y Gohh; P E Morrissey; A P Monaco
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.932

8.  Interplay of cellular and humoral immune responses against BK virus in kidney transplant recipients with polyomavirus nephropathy.

Authors:  Yiping Chen; Jennifer Trofe; Jennifer Gordon; Renaud A Du Pasquier; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Marcelo J Kuroda; E Steve Woodle; Kamel Khalili; Igor J Koralnik
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Intracellular ATP levels in CD4+ lymphocytes are a risk marker of rejection and infection in renal graft recipients.

Authors:  I Pérez-Flores; A Sánchez-Fructuoso; J L Santiago; M Fernández-Arquero; N Calvo; E Gómez de la Concha; A Barrientos
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  Preceeding the rejection: in search for a comprehensive post-transplant immune monitoring platform.

Authors:  Moshe Israeli; Alex Yussim; Eitan Mor; Benjamin Sredni; Tirza Klein
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 1.708

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers to detect rejection after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Vikas R Dharnidharka; Andrew Malone
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Combination of IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-20 and CD40 ligand for the prediction of acute cellular renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Xu; Haiyan Huang; Ming Cai; Yeyong Qian; Zhouli Li; Hongwei Bai; Yong Han; Li Xiao; Wenqiang Zhou; Xinying Wang; Bingyi Shi
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Risk Stratification for Rejection and Infection after Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Pietro E Cippà; Marc Schiesser; Henrik Ekberg; Teun van Gelder; Nicolas J Mueller; Claude A Cao; Thomas Fehr; Corrado Bernasconi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Immunologic monitoring in transplantation revisited.

Authors:  Paolo Cravedi; Peter S Heeger
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 5.  Biomarkers in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  John Choi; Albana Bano; Jamil Azzi
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 1.935

6.  Role of ELISPOT Assays in Risk Assessment Pre- and Post-Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Jennifer R Zitzner; Anat R Tambur
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Immune response following liver transplantation compared to kidney transplantation: usefulness of monitoring peripheral blood CD4+ adenosine triphosphate activity and cytochrome P450 3A5 genotype assay.

Authors:  Yu Nobuoka; Shugo Mizuno; Kouhei Nishikawa; Kaname Nakatani; Yuichi Muraki; Tomomi Yamada; Masahiro Okuda; Tsutomu Nobori; Yoshiki Sugimura; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-12-25

Review 8.  Clinical immune-monitoring strategies for predicting infection risk in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Mario Fernández-Ruiz; Deepali Kumar; Atul Humar
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2014-02-28

Review 9.  Immunologic monitoring in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Natavudh Townamchai; Kassem Safa; Anil Chandraker
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2013-05-29

10.  The Effects of Tacrolimus on T-Cell Proliferation Are Short-Lived: A Pilot Analysis of Immune Function Testing.

Authors:  Benjamin L Laskin; Jing Jiao; H Jorge Baluarte; Sandra Amaral; Susan L Furth; Tatiana Akimova; Wayne W Hancock; Matthew H Levine; Peter P Reese; Ulf H Beier
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.