INTRODUCTION: The aim of our work was to investigate the process of myelination in healthy patients using the diffusion parameters apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), relative anisotropy (RA), fractional anisotropy (FA), and eigenvalues. Age-dependent changes were assessed using the slope m of the fit functions that best described the data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients (3 weeks-19 years) without pathological magnetic resonance imaging findings were selected from all pediatric patients scanned with diffusion tensor imaging over a 5-year period at our institution. ADC, RA, FA, and eigenvalue maps were calculated and regions of interest were selected in anterior/posterior pons, genu/splenium of corpus callosum (CC), anterior/posterior limb of internal capsule (IC), and white matter (WM) regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital WM). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman correlation coefficient and regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean values ranged 71.6 x 10(-5) to 90.3 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s (pons/parietal WM) for ADC, 0.32-0.94 (frontal WM/CC) for RA, and 0.36-0.81 (frontal WM/splenium) for FA. Logarithmic fit functions best described the data. Strong age influences were observed for CC, pons, and parietal/frontal WM and changes were significant for all three eigenvalues, most pronounced for perpendicular eigenvalues. Changes in RA and FA differed depending on the structure anisotropy. CONCLUSIONS: Changes observed for ADC, RA, FA, and eigenvalues with age were consistent with previous findings. Changes detected for RA and FA varied due to the different scaling of both parameters. We found that the use of the largely linear scaled RA adds more valuable information for the assessment of age-dependent structural changes as compared to FA. Additionally, we report normative values for the diffusion parameters studied.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of our work was to investigate the process of myelination in healthy patients using the diffusion parameters apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), relative anisotropy (RA), fractional anisotropy (FA), and eigenvalues. Age-dependent changes were assessed using the slope m of the fit functions that best described the data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients (3 weeks-19 years) without pathological magnetic resonance imaging findings were selected from all pediatric patients scanned with diffusion tensor imaging over a 5-year period at our institution. ADC, RA, FA, and eigenvalue maps were calculated and regions of interest were selected in anterior/posterior pons, genu/splenium of corpus callosum (CC), anterior/posterior limb of internal capsule (IC), and white matter (WM) regions (frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital WM). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman correlation coefficient and regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean values ranged 71.6 x 10(-5) to 90.3 x 10(-5) mm(2)/s (pons/parietal WM) for ADC, 0.32-0.94 (frontal WM/CC) for RA, and 0.36-0.81 (frontal WM/splenium) for FA. Logarithmic fit functions best described the data. Strong age influences were observed for CC, pons, and parietal/frontal WM and changes were significant for all three eigenvalues, most pronounced for perpendicular eigenvalues. Changes in RA and FA differed depending on the structure anisotropy. CONCLUSIONS: Changes observed for ADC, RA, FA, and eigenvalues with age were consistent with previous findings. Changes detected for RA and FA varied due to the different scaling of both parameters. We found that the use of the largely linear scaled RA adds more valuable information for the assessment of age-dependent structural changes as compared to FA. Additionally, we report normative values for the diffusion parameters studied.
Authors: J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: M D De Bellis; M S Keshavan; S R Beers; J Hall; K Frustaci; A Masalehdan; J Noll; A M Boring Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Pratik Mukherjee; Roland G Henry; Steven P Miller; Jeffrey I Berman; Hua Jin; Ying Lu; Orit A Glenn; Donna M Ferriero; A James Barkovich; Daniel B Vigneron Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kenichi Oishi; Susumu Mori; Pamela K Donohue; Thomas Ernst; Lynn Anderson; Steven Buchthal; Andreia Faria; Hangyi Jiang; Xin Li; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Linda Chang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: P Hagmann; O Sporns; N Madan; L Cammoun; R Pienaar; V J Wedeen; R Meuli; J-P Thiran; P E Grant Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yundi Shi; Sarah J Short; Rebecca C Knickmeyer; Jiaping Wang; Christopher L Coe; Marc Niethammer; John H Gilmore; Hongtu Zhu; Martin A Styner Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Kristina T R Ciesielski; Moriah E Stern; Adele Diamond; Sheraz Khan; Evelina A Busa; Timothy E Goldsmith; Andre van der Kouwe; Bruce Fischl; Bruce R Rosen Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 5.357