Literature DB >> 21084730

Modeling deep brain stimulation: point source approximation versus realistic representation of the electrode.

Tianhe C Zhang1, Warren M Grill.   

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders; however, the fundamental mechanisms by which DBS works are not well understood. Computational models of DBS can provide insights into these fundamental mechanisms and typically require two steps: calculation of the electrical potentials generated by DBS and, subsequently, determination of the effects of the extracellular potentials on neurons. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of using a point source electrode to approximate the DBS electrode when calculating the thresholds and spatial distribution of activation of a surrounding population of model neurons in response to monopolar DBS. Extracellular potentials in a homogenous isotropic volume conductor were calculated using either a point current source or a geometrically accurate finite element model of the Medtronic DBS 3389 lead. These extracellular potentials were coupled to populations of model axons, and thresholds and spatial distributions were determined for different electrode geometries and axon orientations. Median threshold differences between DBS and point source electrodes for individual axons varied between -20.5% and 9.5% across all orientations, monopolar polarities and electrode geometries utilizing the DBS 3389 electrode. Differences in the percentage of axons activated at a given amplitude by the point source electrode and the DBS electrode were between -9.0% and 12.6% across all monopolar configurations tested. The differences in activation between the DBS and point source electrodes occurred primarily in regions close to conductor-insulator interfaces and around the insulating tip of the DBS electrode. The robustness of the point source approximation in modeling several special cases--tissue anisotropy, a long active electrode and bipolar stimulation--was also examined. Under the conditions considered, the point source was shown to be a valid approximation for predicting excitation of populations of neurons in response to DBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21084730      PMCID: PMC3076020          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/6/066009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  31 in total

Review 1.  Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexis M Kuncel; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Scott E Cooper; Jaimie M Henderson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A theory of the effects of fibre size in medullated nerve.

Authors:  W A H RUSHTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Andrew G Richardson; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Specific impedance of cerebral white matter.

Authors:  P W Nicholson
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 6.  Current density profiles of surface mounted and recessed electrodes for neural prostheses.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; F A Spelman; M Soma; M F Suesserman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve.

Authors:  S Y Chiu; J M Ritchie; R B Rogart; D Stagg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A model predicting optimal parameters for deep brain stimulation in essential tremor.

Authors:  Scott E Cooper; Alexis M Kuncel; Barbara R Wolgamuth; Ali R Rezai; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Svjetlana Miocinovic; Scott F Lempka; Gary S Russo; Christopher B Maks; Christopher R Butson; Ken E Sakaie; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 10.  Translational principles of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Morten L Kringelbach; Ned Jenkinson; Sarah L F Owen; Tipu Z Aziz
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Automatic preoperative planning of DBS electrode placement using anatomo-clinical atlases and volume of tissue activated.

Authors:  Olga Dergachyova; Yulong Zhao; Claire Haegelen; Pierre Jannin; Caroline Essert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Anodic stimulation misunderstood: preferential activation of fiber orientations with anodic waveforms in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Model-based analysis and design of waveforms for efficient neural stimulation.

Authors:  Warren M Grill
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Frequency-dependent antidromic activation in thalamocortical relay neurons: effects of synaptic inputs.

Authors:  Guosheng Yi; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Subthalamic deep brain stimulation sweet spots and hyperdirect cortical connectivity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Harith Akram; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Saad Jbabdi; Dejan Georgiev; Philipp Mahlknecht; Jonathan Hyam; Thomas Foltynie; Patricia Limousin; Enrico De Vita; Marjan Jahanshahi; Marwan Hariz; John Ashburner; Tim Behrens; Ludvic Zrinzo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Effects of antidromic and orthodromic activation of STN afferent axons during DBS in Parkinson's disease: a simulation study.

Authors:  Guiyeom Kang; Madeleine M Lowery
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Real-time dopamine measurement in awake monkeys.

Authors:  Erik W Schluter; Andrew R Mitz; Joseph F Cheer; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Kilohertz Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation Is Ineffective at Regularizing the Firing of Model Thalamic Neurons.

Authors:  João Couto; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Input-Output Functions in Human Heads Obtained With Cochlear Implant and Transcranial Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Phillip Tran; Matthew L Richardson; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.