Literature DB >> 18791473

A model predicting optimal parameters for deep brain stimulation in essential tremor.

Scott E Cooper1, Alexis M Kuncel, Barbara R Wolgamuth, Ali R Rezai, Warren M Grill.   

Abstract

In nine patients with essential tremor (14 thalami), the authors varied frequency, voltage, and pulsewidth of thalamic deep brain stimulation, and quantified postural tremor. Low frequency stimulation aggravated tremor; the effect increased with increasing voltage. High frequency stimulation had a U-shaped relation to voltage, with minimum tremor at an optimal voltage characteristic of the individual thalamus and increases in voltage beyond the optimum reduced tremor suppression.Based on the hypothesis that tremor response to deep brain stimulation resulted from two competing processes, the authors successfully modeled the relationship of tremor to voltage and frequency of stimulation using a mathematical model. The optimum voltage predicted by the model agreed with the empirically measured value. Moreover, the model made accurate predictions at high stimulation frequency based on measurements made at low stimulation frequency.Our results indicate there is an optimal voltage for tremor suppression by thalamic deep brain stimulation in most patients with essential tremor. The optimum varies across patients, and this is related to electrode position. A mathematical model based on "competing processes" successfully predicts optimum voltage in individual patients. This supports a competing processes model of deep brain stimulation effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791473      PMCID: PMC2978662          DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318182ed44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Jonathan O Dostrovsky; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.338

2.  Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Warren M Grill; David L Sherman; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Deep brain stimulation creates an informational lesion of the stimulated nucleus.

Authors:  Warren M Grill; Andrea N Snyder; Svjetlana Miocinovic
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Clinical response to varying the stimulus parameters in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

Authors:  Alexis M Kuncel; Scott E Cooper; Barbara R Wolgamuth; Merlise A Clyde; Scott A Snyder; Erwin B Montgomery; Ali R Rezai; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 5.  A putative generalized model of the effects and mechanism of action of high frequency electrical stimulation of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Alim-Louis Benabid; Bradley Wallace; John Mitrofanis; Rong Xia; Brigitte Piallat; Stephan Chabardes; François Berger
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.396

6.  Tremor response to polarity, voltage, pulsewidth and frequency of thalamic stimulation.

Authors:  Padraig E O'Suilleabhain; William Frawley; Cole Giller; Richard B Dewey
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Physiological study of presumed ventralis intermedius neurons in the human thalamus.

Authors:  C Ohye; H Narabayashi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Irregular jerky tremor, myoclonus, and thalamus: a study using low-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  B P Bejjani; I Arnulf; M Vidailhet; B Pidoux; P Damier; S Papadopoulos; A M Bonnet; P Cornu; D Dormont; Y Agid
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  Effect of stimulation frequency on tremor suppression in essential tremor.

Authors:  Mwiza Ushe; Jonathan W Mink; Fredy J Revilla; Angie Wernle; Patricia Schneider Gibson; Lori McGee-Minnich; Minna Hong; Keith M Rich; Kelly E Lyons; Rajesh Pahwa; Joel S Perlmutter
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.338

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Explaining clinical effects of deep brain stimulation through simplified target-specific modeling of the volume of activated tissue.

Authors:  B Mädler; V A Coenen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Short latency activation of cortex during clinically effective subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Harrison C Walker; He Huang; Christopher L Gonzalez; James E Bryant; Jeffrey Killen; Gary R Cutter; Robert C Knowlton; Erwin B Montgomery; Bart L Guthrie; Ray L Watts
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 10.338

3.  Restoring the basal ganglia in Parkinson's disease to normal via multi-input phase-shifted deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Rahul Agarwal; Sridevi V Sarma
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

4.  Measurement of evoked potentials during thalamic deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander R Kent; Brandon D Swan; David T Brocker; Dennis A Turner; Robert E Gross; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  The effects of DBS patterns on basal ganglia activity and thalamic relay : a computational study.

Authors:  Rahul Agarwal; Sridevi V Sarma
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Modeling deep brain stimulation: point source approximation versus realistic representation of the electrode.

Authors:  Tianhe C Zhang; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Treatment of essential tremor: a systematic review of evidence and recommendations from the Italian Movement Disorders Association.

Authors:  Mario Zappia; Alberto Albanese; Elisa Bruno; Carlo Colosimo; Graziella Filippini; Paolo Martinelli; Alessandra Nicoletti; Graziella Quattrocchi; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Alfredo Berardelli; Roberta Allegra; Maria Stella Aniello; Antonio E Elia; Davide Martino; Daniela Murgia; Marina Picillo; Giovanna Squintani
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation produces region-specific alterations in local field potential oscillations and evoked responses in vivo.

Authors:  Clinton B McCracken; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electrical stimulation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis reduces anxiety in a rat model.

Authors:  K Luyck; T Tambuyzer; M Deprez; J Rangarajan; B Nuttin; L Luyten
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  [The use of neuromodulation for the treatment of tremor].

Authors:  Damián Bendersky; Pablo Ajler; Claudio Yampolsky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.