Literature DB >> 21084361

Catheter tip force required for mechanical perforation of porcine cardiac chambers.

Dipen Shah1, Hendrik Lambert, Arne Langenkamp, Yuri Vanenkov, Giovanni Leo, Pascale Gentil-Baron, Beat Walpoth.   

Abstract

AIMS: Catheter manipulation during ablation procedures can produce injury and tamponade. We evaluated the mechanical forces required to perforate a porcine heart with an ablation catheter. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A 7 Fr, 3.5 mm irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with a force sensor (FS) within its tip was used to create right atrial (RA) free wall lesions in pigs. The intact heart was removed and the FS-equipped catheter was used to mechanically perforate (without RF delivery) the free walls of both atria and ventricles: directly and through an introducer sheath to prevent catheter shaft buckling. Perforation was also performed through epicardially visible RA lesions and adjacent unablated tissue. Twenty-four RA free wall lesions were created in four pigs. One hundred and forty-four mechanical perforations were performed: 44 RA, 30 left atrial (LA), 37 right ventricular (RV), and 33 left ventricular (LV). The RA and RV perforation force (PF) was lower than through the LA and LV (P<0.0001). The LV perforation time was shorter when the catheter was gripped through an introducer sheath (0.8±0.5 vs. 3.2±3 s, P<0.0001). Perforation force through transmural RA lesions was lower than through unablated RA tissue (172.4±79.1 vs. 300.6±116.8 g, P<0.0002).
CONCLUSION: The force threshold for mechanical perforation in the porcine heart is lower for right- compared with left-sided chambers, and also lower through recently created RA RF lesions compared with unablated RA tissue. Left ventricular perforation is achieved more rapidly with the ablation catheter in a sheath despite the same PF because the sheath prevents catheter buckling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21084361     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  14 in total

1.  Contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Ulrich Krause; David Backhoff; Sophia Klehs; Heike E Schneider; Thomas Paul
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 3.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

Review 4.  Contact Force Assessment In Catheter Ablation Of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Josef Kautzner; Petr Peichl
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-04-30

Review 5.  The Role Of Contact Force In Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakagawa; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30

6.  Contemporary Mapping Techniques of Complex Cardiac Arrhythmias - Identifying and Modifying the Arrhythmogenic Substrate.

Authors:  Emmanuel Koutalas; Sascha Rolf; Borislav Dinov; Sergio Richter; Arash Arya; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-03-10

7.  The Future of Pulmonary Vein Isolation - Single-shot Devices, Remote Navigation or Improving Conventional Radiofrequency Delivery by Contact Monitoring and Lesion Characterisation?

Authors:  David Filgueiras-Rama; Jose L Merino
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-04

8.  FBG sensor for contact level monitoring and prediction of perforation in cardiac ablation.

Authors:  Siu Chun Michael Ho; Mehdi Razavi; Alireza Nazeri; Gangbing Song
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Irrigated tip catheters for radiofrequency ablation in ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Andreas Müssigbrodt; Matthias Grothoff; Borislav Dinov; Jedrzej Kosiuk; Sergio Richter; Philipp Sommer; Ole A Breithardt; Sascha Rolf; Andreas Bollmann; Arash Arya; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Contact force mapping during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: procedural data and one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander Wutzler; Martin Huemer; Abdul Shokor Parwani; Florian Blaschke; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Leif-Hendrik Boldt
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.