Literature DB >> 21079219

Informing the debate: rates of kidney transplantation in nations with presumed consent.

Lucy D Horvat1, Meaghan S Cuerden, S Joseph Kim, John J Koval, Ann Young, Amit X Garg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The kidney is the most common transplanted organ, accounting for almost all living donor transplantations and most deceased donor organ transplantations. The organ shortage has caused policymakers in many nations to debate the merits of adopting presumed consent legislation as a way to increase donor organ donation from deceased donors.
OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics and kidney transplantation rates for countries with presumed consent for deceased organ donation with countries with explicit consent.
DESIGN: A longitudinal study of international kidney transplantation from 1997 to 2007.
SETTING: 44 nations performing kidney transplantation. PATIENTS: Recipients of deceased and living kidney donor transplants. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of transplantation of kidneys from deceased and living donors.
RESULTS: National characteristics, such as population size, proportion of the population self-identified as Catholic, per capita gross domestic product, health expenditures, and physician density, varied widely for the 22 nations with presumed consent and the 22 nations with explicit consent. Deceased donor kidney transplantation rates were higher in nations with presumed consent (median, 22.6 transplantations per million population [pmp]; interquartile range [IQR], 9.3 to 33.8) versus nations with explicit consent (median, 13.9 transplantations pmp; IQR, 3.6 to 23.1). Living donor kidney transplantation rates were lower in nations with presumed consent (median, 2.4 transplantations pmp; IQR, 1.7 to 4.3) versus nations with explicit consent (median, 5.9 transplantations pmp; IQR, 2.3 to 12.2). The findings were consistent when nations were classified according to per capita gross domestic product, health expenditures, and physician density. LIMITATION: As with any observational study, associations may not be causal.
CONCLUSION: Nations with presumed consent have higher rates of deceased donor kidney transplantation than nations with explicit consent. Any nation deciding to adopt presumed consent should carefully consider and reduce any negative effect on rates of living donation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Lawson Health Research Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21079219     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  17 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Opt-out Versus Opt-in Consent on Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation (2006-2016).

Authors:  M Usman Ahmad; Afif Hanna; Ahmed-Zayn Mohamed; Alex Schlindwein; Caitlin Pley; Ingrid Bahner; Rahul Mhaskar; Gavin J Pettigrew; Tambi Jarmi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Presumed Consent: A Potential Tool for Countries Experiencing an Organ Donation Crisis.

Authors:  Sammy Saab; Satvir S Saggi; Mizna Akbar; Gina Choi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Opportunities to Increase Availability of Deceased Donor Kidneys.

Authors:  Richard N Formica
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Organ donation after death in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Frank Markel; Damon C Scales
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Increasing the pool of deceased donor organs for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; Elizabeth Cooney; Kelly Vranas; Caroline M Quill; Mary S McKenzie; Michael O Harhay; Nicole B Gabler; Tatiana Silva; Robert Arnold; Derek C Angus; Cindy Bryce
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Rationale and Design of the Randomized Evaluation of Default Access to Palliative Services (REDAPS) Trial.

Authors:  Katherine R Courtright; Vanessa Madden; Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Dylan S Small; Andrea Troxel; David Casarett; Mary Ersek; J Brian Cassel; Lauren Hersch Nicholas; Gabriel Escobar; Sarah H Hill; Dan O'Brien; Mark Vogel; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-09

Review 8.  Worldwide variability in deceased organ donation registries.

Authors:  Amanda M Rosenblum; Alvin Ho-Ting Li; Leo Roels; Bryan Stewart; Versha Prakash; Janice Beitel; Kimberly Young; Sam Shemie; Peter Nickerson; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.782

9.  Perspectives on Opt-Out Versus Opt-In Legislation for Deceased Organ Donation: An Opinion Piece.

Authors:  Karthik K Tennankore; Scott Klarenbach; Aviva Goldberg
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-06-16

10.  Consenting options for posthumous organ donation: presumed consent and incentives are not favored.

Authors:  Muhammad M Hammami; Hunaida M Abdulhameed; Kristine A Concepcion; Abdullah Eissa; Sumaya Hammami; Hala Amer; Abdelraheem Ahmed; Eman Al-Gaai
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.