Literature DB >> 21077718

Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech.

Alexis G Hervais-Adelman1, Matthew H Davis, Ingrid S Johnsrude, Karen J Taylor, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

Recent work demonstrates that learning to understand noise-vocoded (NV) speech alters sublexical perceptual processes but is enhanced by the simultaneous provision of higher-level, phonological, but not lexical content (Hervais-Adelman, Davis, Johnsrude, & Carlyon, 2008), consistent with top-down learning (Davis, Johnsrude, Hervais-Adelman, Taylor, & McGettigan, 2005; Hervais-Adelman et al., 2008). Here, we investigate whether training listeners with specific types of NV speech improves intelligibility of vocoded speech with different acoustic characteristics. Transfer of perceptual learning would provide evidence for abstraction from variable properties of the speech input. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that learning of NV speech in one frequency region generalizes to an untrained frequency region. In Experiment 2, we assessed generalization among three carrier signals used to create NV speech: noise bands, pulse trains, and sine waves. Stimuli created using these three carriers possess the same slow, time-varying amplitude information and are equated for naïve intelligibility but differ in their temporal fine structure. Perceptual learning generalized partially, but not completely, among different carrier signals. These results delimit the functional and neural locus of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. Generalization across frequency regions suggests that learning occurs at a stage of processing at which some abstraction from the physical signal has occurred, while incomplete transfer across carriers indicates that learning occurs at a stage of processing that is sensitive to acoustic features critical for speech perception (e.g., noise, periodicity). (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21077718     DOI: 10.1037/a0020772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  25 in total

1.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech perception in noise with a harmonic complex excited vocoder.

Authors:  Tyler H Churchill; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell; Antje Ihlefeld; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-22

3.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of auditory training on low-pass filtered speech perception and listening-related cognitive load.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Brian Gygi; Kim Thien N Ho
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-08-12

7.  Word segmentation from noise-band vocoded speech.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Katherine M Simeon; Hillary E Snyder; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; David R Wozny; Holger Mitterer; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2014-07-01

10.  Neural correlates of adaptation in freely-moving normal hearing subjects under cochlear implant acoustic simulations.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Thomas M Talavage; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.