Literature DB >> 21075549

Radiobiological characterization of two therapeutic proton beams with different initial energy spectra used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.

Valentin Calugaru1, Catherine Nauraye, Georges Noël, Nicole Giocanti, Vincent Favaudon, Frédérique Mégnin-Chanet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment planning in proton therapy uses a generic value for the relative biological efficiency (RBE) of 1.1 throughout the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) generated. In this article, we report on the variation of the RBE with depth in the SOBP of the 76- and 201-MeV proton beams used for treatment at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RBE (relative to (137)Cs γ-rays) of the two modulated proton beams at three positions in the SOBP was determined in two human tumor cells using as endpoints clonogenic cell survival and the incidence of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as measured by pulse-field gel electrophoresis without and with enzymatic treatment to reveal clustered lesions.
RESULTS: The RBE for induced cell killing by the 76-MeV beam increased with depth in the SOBP. However for the 201-MeV protons, it was close to that for (137)Cs γ-rays and did not vary significantly. The incidence of DSBs and clustered lesions was higher for protons than for (137)Cs γ-rays, but did not depend on the proton energy or the position in the SOBP.
CONCLUSIONS: Until now, little attention has been paid to the variation of RBE with depth in the SOBP as a function of the nominal energy of the primary proton beam and the molecular nature of the DNA damage. The RBE increase in the 76-MeV SOBP implies that the tumor tissues at the distal end receives a higher biologically equivalent dose than at the proximal end, despite a homogeneous physical dose. This is not the case for the 201-MeV energy beam. The precise determination of the effects of incident beam energy, modulation, and depth in tissues on the linear energy transfer-RBE relationship is essential for treatment planning.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075549     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code.

Authors:  Fada Guan; Christopher Peeler; Lawrence Bronk; Changran Geng; Reza Taleei; Sharmalee Randeniya; Shuaiping Ge; Dragan Mirkovic; David Grosshans; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiogenomic Predictors of Adverse Effects following Charged Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Luisel Ricks-Santi; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

3.  Why RBE must be a variable and not a constant in proton therapy.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Use of gEUD for predicting ear and pituitary gland damage following proton and photon radiation therapy.

Authors:  L De Marzi; L Feuvret; T Boulé; J-L Habrand; F Martin; V Calugaru; N Fournier-Bidoz; R Ferrand; A Mazal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Rudi Labarbe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Relative biological effectiveness of the 60-MeV therapeutic proton beam at the Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN) in Kraków, Poland.

Authors:  Dorota Słonina; Beata Biesaga; Jan Swakoń; Damian Kabat; Leszek Grzanka; Marta Ptaszkiewicz; Urszula Sowa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Investigating Dependencies of Relative Biological Effectiveness for Proton Therapy in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Michelle E Howard; Chris Beltran; Sarah Anderson; Wan Chan Tseung; Jann N Sarkaria; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-03-21

Review 9.  Proton radiobiology.

Authors:  Francesco Tommasino; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.