Literature DB >> 21071590

Male human motor cortex stimulus-response characteristics are not altered by aging.

Ashleigh E Smith1, Martin V Sale, Ryan D Higgins, Gary A Wittert, Julia B Pitcher.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that there are aging-related changes in corticospinal stimulus-response curve characteristics in later life. However, there is also limited evidence that these changes may only be evident in postmenopausal women and not in men. This study compared corticospinal stimulus-response curves from a group of young men [19.8 ± 1.6 yr (range 17-23 yr)] and a group of old men [n = 18, aged 64.1 ± 5.0 yr (range 55-73 yr)]. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the contralateral motor cortex was used to evoke motor potentials at a range of stimulus intensities in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of each hand separately. There was no effect of age group or hemisphere (i.e., left vs. right motor cortex) on motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude or any other stimulus-response characteristic. MEP variability was strongly modulated by resting motor threshold but not by age. M-wave (but not F-wave) amplitude was reduced in old men, but expressing MEP amplitude as a ratio of M-wave amplitude did not reveal any age-related differences in cortically evoked stimulus-response characteristics. We conclude that male corticospinal stimulus-response characteristics are not altered by advancing age and that previously reported age-related changes in motor cortical excitability assessed with TMS are likely due to changes inherent in the female participants only. Future studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between, and functional significance of, changes in circulating neuroactive sex hormones and motor function in later life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21071590     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00403.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  17 in total

Review 1.  A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: an international consensus study.

Authors:  Lucy Chipchase; Siobhan Schabrun; Leonardo Cohen; Paul Hodges; Michael Ridding; John Rothwell; Janet Taylor; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Training-induced modifications of corticospinal reactivity in severely affected stroke survivors.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Sandra G Brauer; Benjamin K Barry; Toby J Gill; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of aging-related muscle weakness.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Corin Bonnett; Dina Gohar; Mehmed Bayram; Alexandria Wyant; Nicole Varnerin; Bernadett Mamone; Vlodek Siemionow; Juliet Hou; Andre Machado; Guang H Yue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Weakening of Corticomuscular Signal Coupling During Voluntary Motor Action in Aging.

Authors:  Mehmed Bugrahan Bayram; Vlodek Siemionow; Guang H Yue
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Long-interval intracortical inhibition is asymmetric in young but not older adults.

Authors:  A-M Vallence; E Smalley; P D Drummond; G R Hammond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A meta-analysis of the effects of aging on motor cortex neurophysiology assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Apoorva Bhandari; Natasha Radhu; Faranak Farzan; Benoit H Mulsant; Tarek K Rajji; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Physical activity modulates corticospinal excitability of the lower limb in young and old adults.

Authors:  Hamidollah Hassanlouei; Christopher W Sundberg; Ashleigh E Smith; Andrew Kuplic; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-05-11

8.  Differential effects of aging and physical activity on corticospinal excitability of upper and lower limb muscles.

Authors:  Vianney Rozand; Jonathon W Senefeld; Christopher W Sundberg; Ashleigh E Smith; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Variability of human corticospinal excitability tracks the state of action preparation.

Authors:  Miriam C Klein-Flügge; David Nobbs; Julia B Pitcher; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cortical mapping of the infraspinatus muscle in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Suzy Ngomo; Catherine Mercier; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.