Literature DB >> 23536071

Variability of human corticospinal excitability tracks the state of action preparation.

Miriam C Klein-Flügge1, David Nobbs, Julia B Pitcher, Sven Bestmann.   

Abstract

Task-evoked trial-by-trial variability is a ubiquitous property of neural responses, yet its functional role remains largely unclear. Recent work in nonhuman primates shows that the temporal structure of neural variability in several brain regions is task-related. For example, trial-by-trial variability in premotor cortex tracks motor preparation with increasingly consistent firing rates and thus a decline in variability before movement onset. However, whether noninvasive measures of the variability of population activity available from humans can similarly track the preparation of actions remains unknown. We tested this by using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) to measure corticospinal excitability (CSE) at different times during action preparation. First, we established the basic properties of intrinsic CSE variability at rest. Then, during the task, responses (left or right button presses) were either directly instructed (forced choice) or resulted from a value decision (choice). Before movement onset, we observed a temporally specific task-related decline in CSE variability contralateral to the responding hand. This decline was stronger in fast-response compared with slow-response trials, consistent with data in nonhuman primates. For the nonresponding hand, CSE variability also decreased, but only in choice trials, and earlier compared with the responding hand, possibly reflecting choice-specific suppression of unselected actions. These findings suggest that human CSE variability measured by TMS over M1 tracks the state of motor preparation, and may reflect the optimization of preparatory population activity. This provides novel avenues in humans to assess the dynamics of action preparation but also more complex processes, such as choice-to-action transformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536071      PMCID: PMC3736101          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2448-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  45 in total

1.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe.

Authors:  R P Dum; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differential attention-dependent response modulation across cell classes in macaque visual area V4.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Kristy A Sundberg; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Changes in the response rate and response variability of area V4 neurons during the preparation of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Nicholas A Steinmetz; Tirin Moore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Trial-to-trial variability in the responses of neurons carries information about stimulus location in the rat whisker thalamus.

Authors:  Alessandro Scaglione; Karen A Moxon; Juan Aguilar; Guglielmo Foffani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Stochastic transitions between neural states in taste processing and decision-making.

Authors:  Paul Miller; Donald B Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Generating coherent patterns of activity from chaotic neural networks.

Authors:  David Sussillo; L F Abbott
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor training modulates intracortical inhibitory dynamics in motor cortex during movement preparation.

Authors:  J Dupont-Hadwen; S Bestmann; C J Stagg
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Human scalp potentials reflect a mixture of decision-related signals during perceptual choices.

Authors:  Marios G Philiastides; Hauke R Heekeren; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Motor Cortex Excitability Reflects the Subjective Value of Reward and Mediates Its Effects on Incentive-Motivated Performance.

Authors:  Joseph K Galaro; Pablo Celnik; Vikram S Chib
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Passive listening to preferred motor tempo modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Kelly Michaelis; Martin Wiener; James C Thompson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Pre-stimulus Alpha Oscillations and Inter-subject Variability of Motor Evoked Potentials in Single- and Paired-Pulse TMS Paradigms.

Authors:  Zafer Iscan; Maria Nazarova; Tommaso Fedele; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The influence of corticospinal activity on TMS-evoked activity and connectivity in healthy subjects: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Petrichella; Nessa Johnson; Bin He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Julien Grandjean; Gerard Derosiere; Ysaline de Wilde; Louise Quemener; Julie Duque
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Motor excitability during movement preparation in Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  Amelia Draper; Lucinda Jude; Georgina M Jackson; Stephen R Jackson
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.864

10.  Descending Control of Nociceptive Processing in Knee Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Intracortical Disinhibition: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Maria da Graca L Tarragó; Alícia Deitos; Aline Patrícia Brietzke; Rafael Vercelino; Iraci L S Torres; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.