Literature DB >> 21071574

The default allocation of attention is broadly ahead of smooth pursuit.

Aarlenne Z Khan1, Philippe Lefèvre, Stephen J Heinen, Gunnar Blohm.   

Abstract

When moving through our environment, it is vital to preferentially process positions on our future path in order to react quickly to critical situations. During smooth pursuit, attention may be directed ahead with either a focused locus or a broad bias. We examined the 2D spatial extent of attention during a smooth pursuit task using both saccade (SRT) and manual (MRT) reaction times as measures of attentional allocation. Targets were flashed at various locations around current eye position while subjects pursued a moving target. Subjects made a saccade or pressed a button as soon as they perceived the target. Both SRTs and MRTs were shortest to targets flashed ahead of compared to behind the direction of pursuit across half of the visual field ahead of pursuit direction. Furthermore, we found an increase specific to SRTs at small target eccentricities directly ahead of pursuit, which may be related to an additional saccade trigger strategy; small saccades take longer to execute if smooth pursuit brings the eyes close to the target. In summary, both SRTs and MRTs revealed that attention is by default broadly allocated in the visual hemi-field ahead of the line of sight during smooth pursuit eye movements. This attentional bias may serve a predictive purpose for facilitating the processing of upcoming events.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21071574     DOI: 10.1167/10.13.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  19 in total

1.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Attentional trade-offs maintain the tracking of moving objects across saccades.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; Marisa Carrasco; Patrick Cavanagh; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Allocation of attention during pursuit of large objects is no different than during fixation.

Authors:  Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Shared attention for smooth pursuit and saccades.

Authors:  Zhenlan Jin; Adam Reeves; Scott N J Watamaniuk; Stephen J Heinen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Adaptation of visual tracking synchronization after one night of sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Jianliang Tong; Jun Maruta; Kristin J Heaton; Alexis L Maule; Jamshid Ghajar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Wendy E Huddleston; Bradley E Ernest
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The effects of enhanced attention and working memory on smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Jacob L Stubbs; Sherryse L Corrow; Benjamin Kiang; William J Panenka; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Choosing a foveal goal recruits the saccadic system during smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Jeremy B Badler; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Gaze is driven by an internal goal trajectory in a visuomotor task.

Authors:  J J Tramper; A Lamont; M Flanders; S Gielen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Flexibility of foveal attention during ocular pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Zhenlan Jin; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.