Literature DB >> 29222695

The effects of enhanced attention and working memory on smooth pursuit eye movement.

Jacob L Stubbs1,2,3, Sherryse L Corrow4, Benjamin Kiang5, William J Panenka6,7, Jason J S Barton4.   

Abstract

It has long been suggested that increasing attentional demands can alter smooth pursuit eye movements, but the precise nature of the changes generated is not clear. Our goal was to examine smooth pursuit with a task that enhanced attention to the target and that increased demands on working memory, without distracting from the target. 15 subjects tracked a target moving around a predictable circular trajectory at a constant tangential velocity. An n-back task with two levels of additional working memory load was integrated into the pursuit target to increase cognitive demands. In the single-task conditions, subjects either performed pursuit alone or the n-back task with a stationary target. In the dual-task conditions, pursuit and the n-back task were performed together. Performance of the n-back tasks was not impaired by simultaneous smooth pursuit. The n-back tasks had negligible effects on horizontal or vertical pursuit gain, but generated increased phase lag and reduced the variability of position error during pursuit. Increasing the difficulty of the n-back task further reduced the variability of position errors. We conclude that enhanced attention does not alter the velocity gain of smooth pursuit but rather improves its consistency. As long as attention remains focused on the target, increased attentional demands further reduce pursuit variability. Increases in phase lag may serve to improve attentional processing of the target.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consistency; Ocular motor; Phase; Variability; Velocity gain; n-Back

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29222695     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5146-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  The default allocation of attention is broadly ahead of smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Philippe Lefèvre; Stephen J Heinen; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Eye-tracking performance and engagement of attention.

Authors:  C Shagass; R A Roemer; M Amadeo
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1976-01

Review 3.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The decoupled mind: mind-wandering disrupts cortical phase-locking to perceptual events.

Authors:  Benjamin Baird; Jonathan Smallwood; Antoine Lutz; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Eye tracking in patients with unipolar and bipolar affective disorders in remission.

Authors:  W G Iacono; L J Peloquin; A E Lumry; R H Valentine; V B Tuason
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1982-02

6.  Initiation of saccades during fixation or pursuit: evidence in humans for a single mechanism.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; F A Miles
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatial allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Lee P Lovejoy; Garth A Fowler; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Kelly J Murphy; Malcolm A Binns; Michael P Alexander
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction.

Authors:  F Xavier Castellanos; Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke; Michael P Milham; Rosemary Tannock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Dynamic visuomotor synchronization: quantification of predictive timing.

Authors:  Jun Maruta; Kristin J Heaton; Elisabeth M Kryskow; Alexis L Maule; Jamshid Ghajar
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Working memory load improves diagnostic performance of smooth pursuit eye movement in mild traumatic brain injury patients with protracted recovery.

Authors:  Jacob L Stubbs; Sherryse L Corrow; Benjamin R Kiang; Jeffrey C Corrow; Hadley L Pearce; Alex Y Cheng; Jason J S Barton; William J Panenka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The role of frontal pursuit area in interaction between smooth pursuit eye movements and attention: A TMS study.

Authors:  Zhenlan Jin; Ruie Gou; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.