Literature DB >> 21068204

Effect of oral snus and medicinal nicotine in smokers on toxicant exposure and withdrawal symptoms: a feasibility study.

Michael Kotlyar1, Louise A Hertsgaard, Bruce R Lindgren, Joni A Jensen, Steven G Carmella, Irina Stepanov, Sharon E Murphy, Stephen S Hecht, Dorothy K Hatsukami.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smokeless, spitless tobacco products are being introduced and marketed as cigarette substitutes. Data are needed regarding how smokers interested in cessation would use these products, the levels of resultant toxicant exposure, and the feasibility of using these products as aids for tobacco cessation.
METHODS: Smokers were randomized to receive Camel Snus (n = 51), Taboka (n = 52), or medicinal nicotine (n = 27) and required to quit smoking for 4 weeks. Measures of toxicant exposure and symptoms of craving and withdrawal were assessed prior to and during product use.
RESULTS: Concentrations of exhaled carbon monoxide, urinary cotinine, urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL), and urinary N'-nitrosonornicotine and its glucuronide (total NNN) were significantly (P values <0.05) lower at the end of treatment in each group except for total NNN in those receiving Camel Snus (P = 0.066). A significant group × time effect was observed for total NNAL concentrations (P = 0.002) with the decrease greatest in the medicinal nicotine group and smallest decrease in the Camel Snus group. No significant differences between groups were found in craving and withdrawal symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Enrolling smokers into a cessation study utilizing newer smokeless tobacco products is feasible. Camel Snus and Taboka use was not found to be superior to medicinal nicotine in reducing withdrawal symptoms but decreases in NNAL were smaller in users of Camel Snus. IMPACT: This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a smoking cessation study utilizing these newer tobacco products. An appropriately powered study is needed to assess smoking cessation rates using these newer products compared with established, safer products such as medicinal nicotine. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21068204      PMCID: PMC3063713          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  35 in total

1.  Potential reduced exposure products (PREPs) for smokeless tobacco users: clinical evaluation methodology.

Authors:  Jennifer N Gray; Alison B Breland; Michael Weaver; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Physiologic and subjective changes from smokeless tobacco withdrawal.

Authors:  D K Hatsukami; S W Gust; R M Keenan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  A new age for snuff?

Authors:  M A Russell; M J Jarvis; C Feyerabend
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Analysis of total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) in human urine.

Authors:  Steven G Carmella; Shaomei Han; Anne Fristad; Yiying Yang; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Nicotine and carcinogen exposure with smoking of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarette.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Evaluation of carcinogen exposure in people who used "reduced exposure" tobacco products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Charlotte Lemmonds; Yan Zhang; Sharon E Murphy; Chap Le; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Risk of gastroesophageal cancer among smokers and users of Scandinavian moist snuff.

Authors:  Kazem Zendehdel; Olof Nyrén; Juhua Luo; Paul W Dickman; Paolo Boffetta; Anders Englund; Weimin Ye
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  An alternative approach to smoking control.

Authors:  B Rodu
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.378

9.  Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal.

Authors:  J R Hughes; D Hatsukami
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03

10.  New and traditional smokeless tobacco: comparison of toxicant and carcinogen levels.

Authors:  Irina Stepanov; Joni Jensen; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  24 in total

1.  Oral tobacco products: preference and effects among smokers.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Joni Jensen; Amanda Anderson; Berry Broadbent; Sharon Allen; Yan Zhang; Herb Severson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  The ratio of a urinary tobacco-specific lung carcinogen metabolite to cotinine is significantly higher in passive than in active smokers.

Authors:  Rachel I Vogel; Steven G Carmella; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Patterns and correlates of polytobacco use in the United States over a decade: NSDUH 2002-2011.

Authors:  Brian V Fix; Richard J O'Connor; Lisa Vogl; Danielle Smith; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Kevin P Conway; Bridget Ambrose; Ling Yang; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Caregivers' interest in using smokeless tobacco products: Novel methods that may reduce children's exposure to secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Theodore L Wagener; Alayna P Tackett; Belinda Borrelli
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2015-04-06

5.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Snus Examining the Effect of Complete Versus Partial Cigarette Substitution on Smoking-Related Behaviors, and Biomarkers of Exposure.

Authors:  Ellen Meier; Bruce R Lindgren; Amanda Anderson; Sarah A Reisinger; Kaila J Norton; Joni Jensen; Lori Strayer; Laura Dick; Mei-Kuen Tang; Menglan Chen; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Sharon E Murphy; Jing Yang; Irina Stepanov; Richard J O'Connor; Peter G Shields; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 6.  Biomarkers of exposure to new and emerging tobacco delivery products.

Authors:  Suzaynn F Schick; Benjamin C Blount; Peyton Jacob; Najat A Saliba; John T Bernert; Ahmad El Hellani; Peter Jatlow; R Steven Pappas; Lanqing Wang; Jonathan Foulds; Arunava Ghosh; Stephen S Hecht; John C Gomez; Jessica R Martin; Clementina Mesaros; Sanjay Srivastava; Gideon St Helen; Robert Tarran; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Ian A Blair; Heather L Kimmel; Claire M Doerschuk; Neal L Benowitz; Aruni Bhatnagar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.464

7.  Animal models to assess the abuse liability of tobacco products: effects of smokeless tobacco extracts on intracranial self-stimulation.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Laura Tally; Clare E Schmidt; Peter Muelken; Irina Stepanov; Subhrakanti Saha; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Naturalistic assessment of demand for cigarettes, snus, and nicotine gum.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stein; A George Wilson; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Michael C Judd; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Perceived Health Risks of Snus and Medicinal Nicotine Products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; R I Vogel; Herb H Severson; Joni A Jensen; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Public education about the relative harm of tobacco products: an intervention for tobacco control professionals.

Authors:  Lois Biener; Amy L Nyman; Irina Stepanov; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.