Literature DB >> 22809421

A chemical group graph representation for efficient high-throughput analysis of atomistic protein simulations.

Noah C Benson1, Valerie Daggett.   

Abstract

Graphs are rapidly becoming a powerful and ubiquitous tool for the analysis of protein structure and for event detection in dynamical protein systems. Despite their rise in popularity, however, the graph representations employed to date have shared certain features and parameters that have not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we examine and compare variations on the construction of graph nodes and graph edges. We propose a graph representation based on chemical groups of similar atoms within a protein rather than residues or secondary structure and find that even very simple analyses using this representation form a powerful event detection system with significant advantages over residue-based graph representations. We additionally compare graph edges based on probability of contact to graph edges based on contact strength and analyses of the entire graph structure to an alternative and more computationally tractable node-based analysis. We develop the simplest useful technique for analyzing protein simulations based on these comparisons and use it to shed light on the speed with which static protein structures adjust to a solvated environment at room temperature in simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22809421      PMCID: PMC3731134          DOI: 10.1142/S0219720012500084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol        ISSN: 0219-7200            Impact factor:   1.122


  19 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Automated Event Detection and Activity Monitoring in Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Willy Wriggers; Kate A Stafford; Yibing Shan; Stefano Piana; Paul Maragakis; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Patrick J Miller; Justin Gullingsrud; Charles A Rendleman; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Analysis of protein sheet topologies by graph theoretical methods.

Authors:  I Koch; F Kaden; J Selbig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1992-04

4.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability.

Authors:  K V Brinda; Saraswathi Vishveshwara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Network analysis of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Csaba Böde; István A Kovács; Máté S Szalay; Robin Palotai; Tamás Korcsmáros; Péter Csermely
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 6.  Proteins as networks: usefulness of graph theory in protein science.

Authors:  Arun Krishnan; Joseph P Zbilut; Masaru Tomita; Alessandro Giuliani
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Dynameomics: mass annotation of protein dynamics and unfolding in water by high-throughput atomistic molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  David A C Beck; Amanda L Jonsson; R Dustin Schaeffer; Kathryn A Scott; Ryan Day; Rudesh D Toofanny; Darwin O V Alonso; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 1.650

8.  Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Marc W van der Kamp; R Dustin Schaeffer; Amanda L Jonsson; Alexander D Scouras; Andrew M Simms; Rudesh D Toofanny; Noah C Benson; Peter C Anderson; Eric D Merkley; Steven Rysavy; Dennis Bromley; David A C Beck; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Interhelical contacts determining the architecture of alpha-helical globular proteins.

Authors:  I V Grigoriev; A A Mironov; A B Rakhmaninova
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1994-12

10.  Essential dynamics of proteins.

Authors:  A Amadei; A B Linssen; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  Protein structure networks provide insight into active site flexibility in esterase/lipases from the carnivorous plant Drosera capensis.

Authors:  Vy T Duong; Megha H Unhelkar; John E Kelly; Suhn H Kim; Carter T Butts; Rachel W Martin
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  A comparison of multiscale methods for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Noah C Benson; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Calmodulin Gates Aquaporin 0 Permeability through a Positively Charged Cytoplasmic Loop.

Authors:  James B Fields; Karin L Németh-Cahalan; J Alfredo Freites; Irene Vorontsova; James E Hall; Douglas J Tobias
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Conserved patterns and interactions in the unfolding transition state across SH3 domain structural homologues.

Authors:  Cullen Demakis; Matthew C Childers; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Sequence comparison, molecular modeling, and network analysis predict structural diversity in cysteine proteases from the Cape sundew, Drosera capensis.

Authors:  Carter T Butts; Xuhong Zhang; John E Kelly; Kyle W Roskamp; Megha H Unhelkar; J Alfredo Freites; Seemal Tahir; Rachel W Martin
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Analyzing disease-associated protein structures with visual analytics.

Authors:  Dennis Bromley; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2013-03-18

7.  Neural Upscaling from Residue-Level Protein Structure Networks to Atomistic Structures.

Authors:  Vy T Duong; Elizabeth M Diessner; Gianmarc Grazioli; Rachel W Martin; Carter T Butts
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.