Literature DB >> 25142412

Dynameomics: data-driven methods and models for utilizing large-scale protein structure repositories for improving fragment-based loop prediction.

Steven J Rysavy1, David A C Beck, Valerie Daggett.   

Abstract

Protein function is intimately linked to protein structure and dynamics yet experimentally determined structures frequently omit regions within a protein due to indeterminate data, which is often due protein dynamics. We propose that atomistic molecular dynamics simulations provide a diverse sampling of biologically relevant structures for these missing segments (and beyond) to improve structural modeling and structure prediction. Here we make use of the Dynameomics data warehouse, which contains simulations of representatives of essentially all known protein folds. We developed novel computational methods to efficiently identify, rank and retrieve small peptide structures, or fragments, from this database. We also created a novel data model to analyze and compare large repositories of structural data, such as contained within the Protein Data Bank and the Dynameomics data warehouse. Our evaluation compares these structural repositories for improving loop predictions and analyzes the utility of our methods and models. Using a standard set of loop structures, containing 510 loops, 30 for each loop length from 4 to 20 residues, we find that the inclusion of Dynameomics structures in fragment-based methods improves the quality of the loop predictions without being dependent on sequence homology. Depending on loop length, ∼ 25-75% of the best predictions came from the Dynameomics set, resulting in lower main chain root-mean-square deviations for all fragment lengths using the combined fragment library. We also provide specific cases where Dynameomics fragments provide better predictions for NMR loop structures than fragments from crystal structures. Online access to these fragment libraries is available at http://www.dynameomics.org/fragments.
© 2014 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  backbone dynamics; dynamic fragments; loop ensemble; loop prediction; model building; structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142412      PMCID: PMC4241109          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  38 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Have we seen all structures corresponding to short protein fragments in the Protein Data Bank? An update.

Authors:  Peicheng Du; Michael Andrec; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2003-06

3.  Modeling of globular proteins. A distance-based data search procedure for the construction of insertion/deletion regions and Pro----non-Pro mutations.

Authors:  N L Summers; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Dynameomics: large-scale assessment of native protein flexibility.

Authors:  Noah C Benson; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Dynameomics: mass annotation of protein dynamics and unfolding in water by high-throughput atomistic molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  David A C Beck; Amanda L Jonsson; R Dustin Schaeffer; Kathryn A Scott; Ryan Day; Rudesh D Toofanny; Darwin O V Alonso; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 1.650

6.  Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Marc W van der Kamp; R Dustin Schaeffer; Amanda L Jonsson; Alexander D Scouras; Andrew M Simms; Rudesh D Toofanny; Noah C Benson; Peter C Anderson; Eric D Merkley; Steven Rysavy; Dennis Bromley; David A C Beck; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  Omega loops: nonregular secondary structures significant in protein function and stability.

Authors:  J S Fetrow
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Functional significance of loops in the receptor binding domain of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIIIA delta-endotoxin.

Authors:  S J Wu; D H Dean
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-02-02       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  BriX: a database of protein building blocks for structural analysis, modeling and design.

Authors:  Peter Vanhee; Erik Verschueren; Lies Baeten; Francois Stricher; Luis Serrano; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Elio A Cino; Wing-Yiu Choy; Mikko Karttunen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  3 in total

1.  The effect of chirality and steric hindrance on intrinsic backbone conformational propensities: tools for protein design.

Authors:  Matthew Carter Childers; Clare-Louise Towse; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Molecular dynamics-derived rotamer libraries for d-amino acids within homochiral and heterochiral polypeptides.

Authors:  Matthew Carter Childers; Clare-Louise Towse; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  A new approach for extracting information from protein dynamics.

Authors:  Jenny Liu; Luís A N Amaral; Sinan Keten
Journal:  ArXiv       Date:  2022-03-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.