Literature DB >> 2106611

Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers.

B J Gerbi1, F M Khan.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of dose at the surface of a phantom and in the buildup region is a difficult task but one that is important for the proper treatment of patients. The instruments of choice for these measurements are extrapolation chambers but few institutions have these instruments at their disposal. As a result, fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers are most commonly used for this purpose. Recent papers have re-emphasized the inaccuracies in the measurement of dose in the buildup region of normally incident photon beams when using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers. Data for Co-60, 6-, 10-, 18-, and 24-MV photon beams are presented that show the magnitude of this over response in the buildup region for several commercially available plane-parallel ionization chambers versus results obtained using both an extrapolation chamber and LiF thermoluminescent detectors. Differences in the percent depth dose at the surface of a phantom of greater than 19% were found for one of the chambers. All chambers over responded in the buildup region to some degree based upon their internal dimensions. The appropriateness of published corrections for these chambers is evaluated and guidelines for the accurate measurement of dose in the buildup region are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2106611     DOI: 10.1118/1.596522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effect of a carbon fiber tabletop on the surface dose and attenuation for high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Tülay P Meydanci; Gönül Kemikler
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-11-22

3.  Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

4.  Surface dose and build-up region measurements with wedge filters for 6 and 18 MV photon beams.

Authors:  Hatice Bilge; Nurdan Ozbek; Murat Okutan; Aydin Cakir; Hilal Acar
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Monitoring external beam radiotherapy using real-time beam visualization.

Authors:  Cesare H Jenkins; Dominik J Naczynski; Shu-Jung S Yu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A method to improve accuracy and precision of water surface identification for photon depth dose measurements.

Authors:  J D Ververs; M J Schaefer; I Kawrakow; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Reduction of Potential Risk for Skin Toxicity in Megavoltage Radiotherapy Using a Novel Rigid Couch.

Authors:  Mikoto Tamura; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Masahiko Okumura; Hiroshi Doi; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Absorption ratio of treatment couch and effect on surface and build-up region doses.

Authors:  Taylan Tuğrul
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-11-20

9.  On the Use of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter for Surface Dose Measurement during Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fasihah Hanum Yusof; Ngie Min Ung; Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong; Wei Loong Jong; Vannyat Ath; Vincent Chee Ee Phua; Siew Ping Heng; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An investigation of the depth dose in the build-up region, and surface dose for a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements.

Authors:  Lukkana Apipunyasopon; Somyot Srisatit; Nakorn Phaisangittisakul
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.