BACKGROUND: Safe, accurate methods permitting simultaneous and/or repeated measurement of red blood cell (RBC) survival (RCS) are important to investigate pathophysiology and therapy of anemia. Methods using chromium 51 ((51) Cr)-labeled RBCs are unacceptable for infants, children, and pregnant women. We report RCS measured in vivo using RBCs labeled with several densities of biotin (BioRBCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Aliquots of autologous RBCs from eight healthy adult subjects were labeled separately at four discrete biotin densities, mixed, and infused. The proportion of each population of BioRBCs circulating was determined serially by flow cytometry over 20 weeks. For each population, RCS was assessed by the following: 1) posttransfusion BioRBC recovery at 24 hours (PTR(24) ); 2) time to decrease to 50% of the enrichment at 24 hours (T(50) ); and 3) mean potential lifespan (MPL). RESULTS: Among the four BioRBC densities, no significant differences in PTR(24) were observed. T(50) and MPL were similar for the two lowest BioRBC densities. In contrast, the two highest BioRBC densities demonstrated progressively decreased T(50) and MPL. CONCLUSIONS: RBCs labeled at four biotin densities can be used to independently and accurately measure PTR(24 ) and two lowest biotin densities can accurately quantitate long-term RCS. This method provides a tool for investigating anemia in infants, fetuses, and pregnant women with the following advantages over the standard (51) Cr method: 1) study subjects are not exposed to radiation; 2) small blood volumes (e.g., 20 µL) are required; and 3) multiple independent RCS measurements can be made simultaneously in the same individual.
BACKGROUND: Safe, accurate methods permitting simultaneous and/or repeated measurement of red blood cell (RBC) survival (RCS) are important to investigate pathophysiology and therapy of anemia. Methods using chromium 51 ((51) Cr)-labeled RBCs are unacceptable for infants, children, and pregnant women. We report RCS measured in vivo using RBCs labeled with several densities of biotin (BioRBCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Aliquots of autologous RBCs from eight healthy adult subjects were labeled separately at four discrete biotin densities, mixed, and infused. The proportion of each population of BioRBCs circulating was determined serially by flow cytometry over 20 weeks. For each population, RCS was assessed by the following: 1) posttransfusion BioRBC recovery at 24 hours (PTR(24) ); 2) time to decrease to 50% of the enrichment at 24 hours (T(50) ); and 3) mean potential lifespan (MPL). RESULTS: Among the four BioRBC densities, no significant differences in PTR(24) were observed. T(50) and MPL were similar for the two lowest BioRBC densities. In contrast, the two highest BioRBC densities demonstrated progressively decreased T(50) and MPL. CONCLUSIONS: RBCs labeled at four biotin densities can be used to independently and accurately measure PTR(24 ) and two lowest biotin densities can accurately quantitate long-term RCS. This method provides a tool for investigating anemia in infants, fetuses, and pregnant women with the following advantages over the standard (51) Cr method: 1) study subjects are not exposed to radiation; 2) small blood volumes (e.g., 20 µL) are required; and 3) multiple independent RCS measurements can be made simultaneously in the same individual.
Authors: G Faxelius; J Raye; R Gutberlet; S Swanstrom; A Tsiantos; E Dolanski; M Dehan; N Dyer; D Lindstrom; A B Brill; M Stahlman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1977-02 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Donald M Mock; Nell I Matthews; Shan Zhu; Leon F Burmeister; M Bridget Zimmerman; Ronald G Strauss; Robert L Schmidt; Demet Nalbant; Gretchen A Cress; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Donald M Mock; Gary L Lankford; John A Widness; Leon F Burmeister; Daniel Kahn; Ronald G Strauss Journal: Transfusion Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: N Aladangady; T C Aitchison; C Beckett; B M Holland; B M Kyle; C A J Wardrop Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: H M Phillips; B M Holland; A Abdel-Moiz; S Fayed; J G Jones; T L Turner; C A Wardrop; F Cockburn Journal: Lancet Date: 1986-04-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert L Schmidt; Donald M Mock; Robert S Franco; Robert M Cohen; Anne K North; José A Cancelas; Christof Geisen; Ronald G Strauss; Alexander P Vlaar; Demet Nalbant; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-03-05 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Donald M Mock; Demet Nalbant; Svetlana V Kyosseva; Robert L Schmidt; Guohua An; Nell I Matthews; Alexander P J Vlaar; Robin van Bruggen; Dirk de Korte; Ronald G Strauss; José A Cancelas; Robert S Franco; Peter Veng-Pedersen; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Tamir Kanias; Mars Stone; Grier P Page; Yuelong Guo; Stacy M Endres-Dighe; Marion C Lanteri; Bryan R Spencer; Ritchard G Cable; Darrell J Triulzi; Joseph E Kiss; Edward L Murphy; Steve Kleinman; Mark T Gladwin; Michael P Busch; Alan E Mast Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Mikhail A Proskurnin; Tatyana V Zhidkova; Dmitry S Volkov; Mustafa Sarimollaoglu; Ekaterina I Galanzha; Donald Mock; Dmitry A Nedosekin; Vladimir P Zharov Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Mohammad I Saleh; Demet Nalbant; John A Widness; Peter Veng-Pedersen Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Donald M Mock; John A Widness; Peter Veng-Pedersen; Ronald G Strauss; Jose A Cancelas; Robert M Cohen; Christopher J Lindsell; Robert S Franco Journal: Transfus Med Rev Date: 2014-04-05
Authors: John A Widness; Denison J Kuruvilla; Donald M Mock; Nell I Matthews; Demet Nalbant; Gretchen A Cress; Robert L Schmidt; Ronald G Strauss; M Bridget Zimmerman; Peter Veng-Pedersen Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Rajiv P Shrestha; Joseph Horowitz; Christopher V Hollot; Michael J Germain; John A Widness; Donald M Mock; Peter Veng-Pedersen; Yossi Chait Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 2.745