Robert L Schmidt1, Donald M Mock2,3, Robert S Franco4, Robert M Cohen5, Anne K North6, José A Cancelas7, Christof Geisen8, Ronald G Strauss1,9, Alexander P Vlaar10, Demet Nalbant1, John A Widness1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. 2. Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. 3. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Medical Service, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 6. Cerus Corporation, Concord, California. 7. Hoxworth Blood Center and the Department of Pediatrics, The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 8. Institut für Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhämatologie, Klinikum der Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, DRK-Blutspendedienst, Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Germany. 9. Department of Pathology, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. 10. Department of Intensive Care and Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesia, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biotin-labeled red blood cells (BioRBCs) are used for in vivo kinetic studies. Because BioRBC dosing occasionally induces antibodies, a sensitive and specific anti-BioRBC detection assay is needed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Aims were to 1) develop a gel card assay to evaluate existing, naturally occurring and BioRBC-induced plasma antibodies, 2) compare gel card and tube agglutination detection results, and 3) test for a relationship of antibody induction and BioRBC dose. Reagent BioRBCs were prepared using sulfo-NHS biotin ranging from densities 18 (BioRBC-18) to 1458 (BioRBC-1458) µg/mL RBCs. RESULTS: Among BioRBC-exposed subjects, gel card and tube agglutination results were concordant in 21 of 22 adults and all 19 infant plasma samples. Gel card antibody detection sensitivity was more than 10-fold greater than tube agglutination. Twelve to 16 weeks after BioRBC exposure, induced anti-antibodies were detected by gel card in three of 26 adults (12%) at reagent densities BioRBC-256 or less, but in none of 41 infants. Importantly, induced anti-BioRBC antibodies were associated with higher BioRBC dose (p = 0.008); no antibodies were detected in 18 subjects who received BioRBC doses less than or equal to BioRBC-18. For noninduced BioRBC antibodies, six of 1125 naïve adults (0.3%) and none of 46 naïve infants demonstrated existing anti-BioRBC antibodies using reagent BioRBC-140 or -162. Existing anti-BioRBCs were all neutralized by biotin compounds, while induced antibodies were not. CONCLUSIONS: The gel card assay is more sensitive than the tube agglutination assay. We recommend reagent BioRBC-256 for identifying anti-BioRBCs. Use of a low total RBC biotin label dose (≤ BioRBC-18) may minimize antibody induction.
BACKGROUND:Biotin-labeled red blood cells (BioRBCs) are used for in vivo kinetic studies. Because BioRBC dosing occasionally induces antibodies, a sensitive and specific anti-BioRBC detection assay is needed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Aims were to 1) develop a gel card assay to evaluate existing, naturally occurring and BioRBC-induced plasma antibodies, 2) compare gel card and tube agglutination detection results, and 3) test for a relationship of antibody induction and BioRBC dose. Reagent BioRBCs were prepared using sulfo-NHS biotin ranging from densities 18 (BioRBC-18) to 1458 (BioRBC-1458) µg/mL RBCs. RESULTS: Among BioRBC-exposed subjects, gel card and tube agglutination results were concordant in 21 of 22 adults and all 19 infant plasma samples. Gel card antibody detection sensitivity was more than 10-fold greater than tube agglutination. Twelve to 16 weeks after BioRBC exposure, induced anti-antibodies were detected by gel card in three of 26 adults (12%) at reagent densities BioRBC-256 or less, but in none of 41 infants. Importantly, induced anti-BioRBC antibodies were associated with higher BioRBC dose (p = 0.008); no antibodies were detected in 18 subjects who received BioRBC doses less than or equal to BioRBC-18. For noninduced BioRBC antibodies, six of 1125 naïve adults (0.3%) and none of 46 naïve infants demonstrated existing anti-BioRBC antibodies using reagent BioRBC-140 or -162. Existing anti-BioRBCs were all neutralized by biotin compounds, while induced antibodies were not. CONCLUSIONS: The gel card assay is more sensitive than the tube agglutination assay. We recommend reagent BioRBC-256 for identifying anti-BioRBCs. Use of a low total RBC biotin label dose (≤ BioRBC-18) may minimize antibody induction.
Authors: Donald M Mock; Nell I Matthews; Shan Zhu; Leon F Burmeister; M Bridget Zimmerman; Ronald G Strauss; Robert L Schmidt; Demet Nalbant; Gretchen A Cress; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Thomas J Van 't Erve; Brett A Wagner; Sean M Martin; C Michael Knudson; Robyn Blendowski; Mignon Keaton; Tracy Holt; John R Hess; Garry R Buettner; Kelli K Ryckman; Benjamin W Darbro; Jeffrey C Murray; Thomas J Raife Journal: Transfusion Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: John A Widness; Denison J Kuruvilla; Donald M Mock; Nell I Matthews; Demet Nalbant; Gretchen A Cress; Robert L Schmidt; Ronald G Strauss; M Bridget Zimmerman; Peter Veng-Pedersen Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Anna L Peters; Boukje Beuger; Donald M Mock; John A Widness; Dirk de Korte; Nicole P Juffermans; Alexander P J Vlaar; Robin van Bruggen Journal: Transfusion Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: John A Widness; Demet Nalbant; Nell I Matthews; Ronald G Strauss; Robert L Schmidt; Gretchen A Cress; Miriam Bridget Zimmerman; Donald M Mock Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Donald M Mock; Demet Nalbant; Svetlana V Kyosseva; Robert L Schmidt; Guohua An; Nell I Matthews; Alexander P J Vlaar; Robin van Bruggen; Dirk de Korte; Ronald G Strauss; José A Cancelas; Robert S Franco; Peter Veng-Pedersen; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Patrick D Carroll; M Bridget Zimmerman; Demet Nalbant; Earl L Gingerich; Guohua An; Gretchen A Cress; Peter Veng-Pedersen; John A Widness Journal: Neonatology Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Albert D Donnenberg; Tamir Kanias; Darrell J Triulzi; Catherine J Dennis; E Michael Meyer; Mark Gladwin Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Donald M Mock; Sean R Stowell; Robert S Franco; Svetlana V Kyosseva; Demet Nalbant; Robert L Schmidt; Gretchen A Cress; Ronald G Strauss; José A Cancelas; Melissa von Goetz; Anne K North; John A Widness Journal: Transfusion Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Sanne de Bruin; Emma K van de Weerdt; Davina Sijbrands; Richard Vlaar; Eric Gouwerok; Bart J Biemond; Alexander P J Vlaar; Robin van Bruggen; Dirk de Korte Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 3.157