PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) (FDG PET/CT) for the staging and the follow-up of anal carcinoma, and to evaluate the impact of FDG PET/CT on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with anal carcinoma were referred to our department from October 2004 until July 2008. The diagnostic performance was evaluated on a perexamination basis and on a per-site basis, together with impact of PET/CT on patient management. The standard of truth was histology when available and, in all cases, follow-up data during at least 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty-eight FDG PET/CT performed in 44 patients were analysed—22 for initial staging and 36 during follow-up. The detection rate of non-excised tumours on initial examination was 93%. During post-treatment follow-up, FDG PET/CT had, on a per-examination basis, sensitivity for the detection of persistent or recurrent disease of 93% and specificity of 81%, and on a per-site basis, 86% and 97%, respectively. Its negative predictive value was 94% on a per-examination basis and 98% on a per-site basis. FDG PET/CT had an impact on management in nine patients out of 44 (20%), which was relevant in eight of them (89%). CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality in anal cancer. It has an interesting added value during post-treatment follow-up, especially when persistence or recurrence of disease is suspected. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether surveillance by means of FDG PET/CT might have a positive impact on overall survival.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) (FDG PET/CT) for the staging and the follow-up of anal carcinoma, and to evaluate the impact of FDG PET/CT on patient management. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with anal carcinoma were referred to our department from October 2004 until July 2008. The diagnostic performance was evaluated on a perexamination basis and on a per-site basis, together with impact of PET/CT on patient management. The standard of truth was histology when available and, in all cases, follow-up data during at least 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty-eight FDG PET/CT performed in 44 patients were analysed—22 for initial staging and 36 during follow-up. The detection rate of non-excised tumours on initial examination was 93%. During post-treatment follow-up, FDG PET/CT had, on a per-examination basis, sensitivity for the detection of persistent or recurrent disease of 93% and specificity of 81%, and on a per-site basis, 86% and 97%, respectively. Its negative predictive value was 94% on a per-examination basis and 98% on a per-site basis. FDG PET/CT had an impact on management in nine patients out of 44 (20%), which was relevant in eight of them (89%). CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality in anal cancer. It has an interesting added value during post-treatment follow-up, especially when persistence or recurrence of disease is suspected. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether surveillance by means of FDG PET/CT might have a positive impact on overall survival.
Authors: Phillip R Fleshner; Sridhar Chalasani; George J Chang; David H Levien; Neil H Hyman; W Donald Buie Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Julie K Schwarz; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Robert J Myerson; James W Fleshman; Perry W Grigsby Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Aren van Waarde; David C P Cobben; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Bram Maas; Willem Vaalburg; Erik F J de Vries; Pieter L Jager; Harald J Hoekstra; Philip H Elsinga Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paulo C Soares; Eliana S Abdelhay; Luiz Claudio S Thuler; Bruno Moreira Soares; Samia Demachki; Gessica Valéria Rocha Ferro; Paulo P Assumpção; Leticia Martins Lamarão; Luis Felipe Ribeiro Pinto; Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 3.621