Literature DB >> 17707268

PET-CT fusion in radiation management of patients with anorectal tumors.

Cynthia Anderson1, Mary Koshy, Charles Staley, Natia Esiashvili, Sharam Ghavidel, Zach Fowler, Tim Fox, Fabio Esteves, Jerome Landry, Karen Godette.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare computed tomography (CT) with positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) scans with respect to anorectal tumor volumes, correlation in overlap, and influence on radiation treatment fields and patient care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March to November 2003, 20 patients with rectal cancer and 3 patients with anal cancer were treated with preoperative or definitive chemoradiation, respectively. Computed tomography simulation data generated a CT gross tumor volume (CT-GTV) and CT planning target volume (CT-PTV) and (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose PET (FDG-PET) created a PET-GTV and PET-PTV. The PET-CT and CT images were fused using manual coregistration. Patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal therapy to traditional doses. The PET, CT, and overlap volumes (OVs) were measured in cubic centimeters.
RESULTS: Mean PET-GTV was smaller than the mean CT-GTV (91.7 vs. 99.6 cm(3)). The mean OV was 46.7%. As tumor volume increased, PET and CT OV correlated significantly (p < 0.001). In 17% of patients PET-CT altered the PTV, and in 26% it changed the radiation treatment plan. For 25% of patients with rectal cancer, PET detected distant metastases and changed overall management. Ten rectal cancer patients underwent surgery. When the pretreatment PET standardized uptake value was >10 and the posttreatment PET standardized uptake value was <6, 100% achieved pathologic downstaging (p = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in volume was significant, with 17% and 26% of patients requiring a change in treatment fields and patient management, respectively. Positron emission tomography can change the management for anorectal tumors by early detection of metastatic disease or disease outside standard radiation fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17707268     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy.

Authors:  Guido Lammering; Dirk De Ruysscher; Angela van Baardwijk; Brigitta G Baumert; Jacques Borger; Ludy Lutgens; Piet van den Ende; Michel Ollers; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  The treatment of squamous anal carcinoma: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colo-Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  I Giani; M Mistrangelo; C Fucini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Technical aspects of radiation therapy for anal cancer.

Authors:  Eli D Scher; Inaya Ahmed; Ning J Yue; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

4.  Impact of FDG PET/CT in the staging and the follow-up of anal carcinoma.

Authors:  Laetitia Vercellino; Françoise Montravers; Vincent de Parades; Virginie Huchet; Khaldoun Kerrou; Pierre Bauer; Emmanuel Touboul; Jean-Noël Talbot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and target volume delineation in conformal radiotherapy of anal carcinoma.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Maria E Milia; Lucia Turri; Eleonora Mones; Maria C Bassi; Barbara Cannillo; Letizia Deantonio; Gianmauro Sacchetti; Marco Brambilla; Eugenio Inglese
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  11C-methionine-PET for evaluation of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Koizumi; Tsuneo Saga; Kyosan Yoshikawa; Kazutoshi Suzuki; Shigeru Yamada; Mitsuhiko Hasebe; Seiya Ohashi; Sherif Abd-Elrazek; Hiroyuki Ishikawa; Kenji Sagou; Katsumi Tamura; Ryusuke Hara; Hirotoshi Kato; Shigeo Yasuda; Takeshi Yanagi; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Impact of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT on staging and irradiation of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Brigita Paskeviciute; Tobias Bölling; Markus Brinkmann; Ganna Rudykina; Iris Ernst; Lars Stegger; Otmar Schober; Normann Willich; Matthias Weckesser; Stefan Könemann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 8.  Current management of anal canal cancer.

Authors:  Brian G Czito; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Target volume delineation of anal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Espen Rusten; Bernt Louni Rekstad; Christine Undseth; Ghazwan Al-Haidari; Bettina Hanekamp; Eivor Hernes; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Eirik Malinen; Marianne Grønlie Guren
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  FDG PET/CT for rectal carcinoma radiotherapy treatment planning: comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Nadia Withofs; Claire Bernard; Catherine Van der Rest; Philippe Martinive; Mathieu Hatt; Sebastien Jodogne; Dimitris Visvikis; John A Lee; Philippe A Coucke; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.