Literature DB >> 17996387

Tumor response and survival predicted by post-therapy FDG-PET/CT in anal cancer.

Julie K Schwarz1, Barry A Siegel, Farrokh Dehdashti, Robert J Myerson, James W Fleshman, Perry W Grigsby.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response to therapy for anal carcinoma using post-therapy imaging with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and to compare the metabolic response with patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 53 consecutive patients with anal cancer. All patients underwent pre- and post-treatment whole-body FDG-PET/computed tomography. Patients had been treated with external beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Whole-body FDG-PET was performed 0.9-5.4 months (mean, 2.1) after therapy completion.
RESULTS: The post-therapy PET scan did not show any abnormal FDG uptake (complete metabolic response) in 44 patients. Persistent abnormal FDG uptake (partial metabolic response) was found in the anal tumor in 9 patients. The 2-year cause-specific survival rate was 94% for patients with a complete vs. 39% for patients with a partial metabolic response in the anal tumor (p = 0.0008). The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 95% for patients with a complete vs. 22% for patients with a partial metabolic response in the anal tumor (p < 0.0001). A Cox proportional hazards model of survival outcome indicated that a complete metabolic response was the most significant predictor of progression-free survival in our patient population (p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: A partial metabolic response in the anal tumor as determined by post-therapy FDG-PET is predictive of significantly decreased progression-free and cause-specific survival after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17996387     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  32 in total

1.  Pre-treatment magnetic resonance-based texture features as potential imaging biomarkers for predicting event free survival in anal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Arnaud Hocquelet; Thibaut Auriac; Cynthia Perier; Clarisse Dromain; Marie Meyer; Jean-Baptiste Pinaquy; Alban Denys; Hervé Trillaud; Baudouin Denis De Senneville; Véronique Vendrely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Minghuan Li; Hanxi Zhao; Xindong Sun; Zheng Fu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Decreased Posttreatment SUV on PET Scan Is Associated With Improved Local Control in Medically Inoperable Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Navesh K Sharma; Joshua S Silverman; Tianyu Li; Jonathan Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Oleh Haluszka; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Gary M Freedman; Andre A Konski
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05

4.  Anal cancer FDG-PET standard uptake value: correlation with tumor characteristics, treatment response and survival.

Authors:  Letizia Deantonio; Maria Elisa Milia; Tiziana Cena; Gianmauro Sacchetti; Carola Perotti; Marco Brambilla; Lucia Turri; Marco Krengli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Prognostic factors derived from a prospective database dictate clinical biology of anal cancer: the intergroup trial (RTOG 98-11).

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Kathryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; John Pedersen; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Jin-Bo Yue; Han-Xi Zhao; Xin-Dong Sun; Li Kong; Zheng Fu; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Prognostic impact of tumour burden assessed by metabolic tumour volume on FDG PET/CT in anal canal cancer.

Authors:  Mathieu Gauthé; Marion Richard-Molard; Juliette Fayard; Jean-Louis Alberini; Wulfran Cacheux; Astrid Lièvre
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Can the radiation dose to CT-enlarged but FDG-PET-negative inguinal lymph nodes in anal cancer be reduced?

Authors:  Sabine Kathrin Mai; Grit Welzel; Brigitte Hermann; Frederik Wenz; Uwe Haberkorn; Dietmar Jörg Dinter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Leonard L Gunderson; Jennifer Moughan; Jaffer A Ajani; John E Pedersen; Kathryn A Winter; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  PET imaging in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aamer Mahmud; Raymond Poon; Derek Jonker
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.