Literature DB >> 21060518

Blind deconvolution of fluorescence micrographs by maximum-likelihood estimation.

V Krishnamurthi, Y H Liu, S Bhattacharyya, J N Turner, T J Holmes.   

Abstract

We report some recent algorithmic refinements and the resulting simulated and real image reconstructions of fluorescence micrographs by using a blind-deconvolution algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation. Blind-deconvolution methods encompass those that do not require either calibrated or theoretical predetermination of the point-spread function (PSF). Instead, a blind deconvolution reconstructs the PSF concurrently with deblurring of the image data. Two-dimensional computer simulations give some definitive evidence of the integrity of the reconstructions of both the fluorescence concentration and the PSF. A reconstructed image and a reconstructed PSF from a two-dimensional fluorescent data set show that the blind version of the algorithm produces images that are comparable with those previously produced by a precursory nonblind version of the algorithm. They furthermore show a remarkable similarity, albeit not perfectly identical, with a PSF measurement taken for the same data set, provided by Agard and colleagues. A reconstructed image of a three-dimensional confocal data set shows a substantial axial smear removal. There is currently an existing trade-off in using the blind deconvolution in that it converges at a slightly slower rate than the nonblind approach. Future research, of course, will address this present limitation.

Year:  1995        PMID: 21060518     DOI: 10.1364/AO.34.006633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging the division process in living tissue culture cells.

Authors:  Alexey Khodjakov; Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Calibration of wide-field deconvolution microscopy for quantitative fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Ji-Sook Lee; Tse-Luen Erika Wee; Claire M Brown
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2014-04

3.  An open-source deconvolution software package for 3-D quantitative fluorescence microscopy imaging.

Authors:  Y Sun; P Davis; E A Kosmacek; F Ianzini; M A Mackey
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 4.  Bending the rules: widefield microscopy and the Abbe limit of resolution.

Authors:  Jolien S Verdaasdonk; Andrew D Stephens; Julian Haase; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Molecular and Structural Traits of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1/LC3 Nuclear Structures and Their Role in Autophagy Control and Tumor Cell Survival.

Authors:  Adam Lassak; Mathew Dean; Dorota Wyczechowska; Anna Wilk; Luis Marrero; Jimena Trillo-Tinoco; A Hamid Boulares; Jann N Sarkaria; Luis Del Valle; Francesca Peruzzi; Augusto Ochoa; Krzysztof Reiss
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Improving signal-to-noise ratio of structured light microscopy based on photon reassignment.

Authors:  Vijay Raj Singh; Heejin Choi; Elijah Y S Yew; Dipanjan Bhattacharya; Luo Yuan; Colin J R Sheppard; Jagath C Rajapakse; George Barbastathis; Peter T C So
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Two New FRET Imaging Measures: Linearly Proportional to and Highly Contrasting the Fraction of Active Molecules.

Authors:  Masataka Yamao; Kazuhiro Aoki; Naoto Yukinawa; Shin Ishii; Michiyuki Matsuda; Honda Naoki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Distinct predictive performance of Rac1 and Cdc42 in cell migration.

Authors:  Masataka Yamao; Honda Naoki; Katsuyuki Kunida; Kazuhiro Aoki; Michiyuki Matsuda; Shin Ishii
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.