Literature DB >> 24688321

Calibration of wide-field deconvolution microscopy for quantitative fluorescence imaging.

Ji-Sook Lee1, Tse-Luen Erika Wee2, Claire M Brown2.   

Abstract

Deconvolution enhances contrast in fluorescence microscopy images, especially in low-contrast, high-background wide-field microscope images, improving characterization of features within the sample. Deconvolution can also be combined with other imaging modalities, such as confocal microscopy, and most software programs seek to improve resolution as well as contrast. Quantitative image analyses require instrument calibration and with deconvolution, necessitate that this process itself preserves the relative quantitative relationships between fluorescence intensities. To ensure that the quantitative nature of the data remains unaltered, deconvolution algorithms need to be tested thoroughly. This study investigated whether the deconvolution algorithms in AutoQuant X3 preserve relative quantitative intensity data. InSpeck Green calibration microspheres were prepared for imaging, z-stacks were collected using a wide-field microscope, and the images were deconvolved using the iterative deconvolution algorithms with default settings. Afterwards, the mean intensities and volumes of microspheres in the original and the deconvolved images were measured. Deconvolved data sets showed higher average microsphere intensities and smaller volumes than the original wide-field data sets. In original and deconvolved data sets, intensity means showed linear relationships with the relative microsphere intensities given by the manufacturer. Importantly, upon normalization, the trend lines were found to have similar slopes. In original and deconvolved images, the volumes of the microspheres were quite uniform for all relative microsphere intensities. We were able to show that AutoQuant X3 deconvolution software data are quantitative. In general, the protocol presented can be used to calibrate any fluorescence microscope or image processing and analysis procedure.

Keywords:  intensity; microspheres; volume

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24688321      PMCID: PMC3942261          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.14-2501-002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  15 in total

Review 1.  The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  J Pawley
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.993

2.  A workingperson's guide to deconvolution in light microscopy.

Authors:  W Wallace; L H Schaefer; J R Swedlow
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 3.  Quantitative fluorescence microscopy and image deconvolution.

Authors:  Jason R Swedlow
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 4.  Live cell imaging using wide-field microscopy and deconvolution.

Authors:  Jason R Swedlow; Melpomeni Platani
Journal:  Cell Struct Funct       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.212

5.  Methods for imaging thick specimens: confocal microscopy, deconvolution, and structured illumination.

Authors:  John M Murray
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2011-12-01

Review 6.  Quantitative fluorescence microscopy and image deconvolution.

Authors:  Jason R Swedlow
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 7.  Fluorescence microscopy--avoiding the pitfalls.

Authors:  Claire M Brown
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Quantitative fluorescence microscopy techniques.

Authors:  Alessandro Esposito; Simon Schlachter; Gabriele S Kaminski Schierle; Alan D Elder; Alberto Diaspro; Fred S Wouters; Clemens F Kaminski; Asparouh I Iliev
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

9.  Dispersion, aberration and deconvolution in multi-wavelength fluorescence images.

Authors:  B A Scalettar; J R Swedlow; J W Sedat; D A Agard
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Quality assurance testing for modern optical imaging systems.

Authors:  Robert F Stack; Carol J Bayles; Anne-Marie Girard; Karen Martin; Cynthia Opansky; Katherine Schulz; Richard W Cole
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.127

View more
  4 in total

1.  Refined Quantitation of Sweat Gland Innervation.

Authors:  Karla Minota; Ann M Schmeichel; Jade A Gehrking; Jay N Mandrekar; Phillip A Low; Wolfgang Singer
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  A Flow Perfusion Bioreactor System for Vocal Fold Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Neda Latifi; Hossein K Heris; Scott L Thomson; Rani Taher; Siavash Kazemirad; Sara Sheibani; Nicole Y K Li-Jessen; Hojatollah Vali; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Automated quantification and integrative analysis of 2D and 3D mitochondrial shape and network properties.

Authors:  Julie Nikolaisen; Linn I H Nilsson; Ina K N Pettersen; Peter H G M Willems; James B Lorens; Werner J H Koopman; Karl J Tronstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hippocampal interleukin-1 mediates stress-enhanced fear learning: A potential role for astrocyte-derived interleukin-1β.

Authors:  Meghan E Jones; Christina L Lebonville; Jacqueline E Paniccia; Megan E Balentine; Kathryn J Reissner; Donald T Lysle
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.217

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.