| Literature DB >> 17479890 |
Noel D McCarthy1, Frances M Colles, Kate E Dingle, Mary C Bagnall, Georgina Manning, Martin C J Maiden, Daniel Falush.
Abstract
Host association of Campylobacter jejuni was analyzed by using multilocus sequence typing data for 713 isolates from chickens and bovids (cattle and sheep). Commonly used summary measures of genotypes (sequence type and clonal complex) showed poor accuracy, but a method using the full allelic profile showed 80% accuracy in distinguishing isolates from these 2 host groups. We explored the biologic basis of more accurate results with allelic profiles. Strains isolated from specific hosts have imported a substantial number of alleles while circulating in those host species. These results imply that 1) although Campylobacter moves frequently between hosts, most transmission is within species, and 2) lineages can acquire a host signature and potentially adapt to the host through recombination. Assignment using this signature enables improved prediction of source for pathogens that undergo frequent genetic recombination.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17479890 PMCID: PMC2063414 DOI: 10.3201/eid1302.060620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Campylobacter jejuni isolates by year of isolation and host species
| Year | Chickens | Cattle | Sheep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 1983 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 55 |
| 1991 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 36 |
| 1992 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 1993 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
| 1994 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| 1995 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| 1996 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| 1997 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 40 | 41 | 68 | 149 |
| 1999 | 10 | 38 | 38 | 86 |
| 2000 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 21 |
| 2001 | 45 | 83 | 5 | 133 |
| 2002 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 2003 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Unspecified | 34 | 29 | 43 | 106 |
| Total | 309 | 245 | 159 | 713 |
Campylobacter jejuni isolates by country and host species
| Country | Chicken | Cattle | Sheep | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Czech Republic | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Denmark | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| The Netherlands | 53 | 4 | 0 | 57 |
| New Zealand | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Northern Ireland | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| United Kingdom | 217 | 218 | 158 | 593 |
| United States | 17 | 13 | 1 | 31 |
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 309 | 245 | 159 | 713 |
Capacity of alleles, overall sequence type, and clonal complex information to predict host species for Campylobacter jejuni isolates from cattle, sheep, and chickens
| Genotype information used | % correct | % uncertainty removed* |
|---|---|---|
| Alleles | 58 | 37 |
| Sequence type | 40 | 10 |
| Clonal complex (1)† | 42 | 13 |
| Clonal complex (2)† | 42 | 13 |
| Alleles plus sequence type | 60 | 40 |
| Alleles plus clonal complex† | 58 | 37 |
*Random selection would be expected to predict correctly 33% of the time. The proportion of the remaining uncertainty (67%) that is resolved is shown.
†Clonal complex (1) substituted sequence type for clonal complex in which no clonal complex is assigned and clonal complex (2) substituted a missing value code. Clonal complex (1) was also used to assess alleles plus clonal complex.
Comparison of actual host and predicted host among Campylobacter jejuni from cattle, sheep, and chickens
| Actual host | Sample size (n) | Predicted host, % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken | Cow | Sheep | ||
| Chicken | 309 | 66 | 14 | 19 |
| Cow | 245 | 12 | 50 | 38 |
| Sheep | 159 | 10 | 36 | 54 |
Animal subpopulations used to study the effect of time and sample location on isolates of Campylobacter jejuni
| Source* | No. animals |
|---|---|
| Early UK chickens | 114 |
| Late UK chickens | 78 |
| All UK chickens | 217 |
| Dutch chickens | 53 |
| Non-UK chickens | 92 |
| Late UK cattle and sheep | 273 |
*Early, 1990–1997; late, 1998–2003.
FigurePrediction of source of origin within the sequence type ST-21 complex. A) Observed accuracy of prediction (arrow) compared with distribution of values obtained by permuting host labels so that the alleles varying from central genotype are not informative on host of origin. B) Prediction of origin by using only alleles for which substantial reference information is available. Light lines indicate alleles different from ST-21 present mainly in chickens in the reference population (i.e., an allele that would predict chicken origin); dark lines indicate alleles present mainly in bovids (i.e., predicts bovid origin). Light boxes indicate STs found only in chickens, dark boxes indicate STs found only in bovids, and boxes with light and dark shading indicate STs found in bovids and chickens.