Literature DB >> 2105781

Current practice in transferring critically ill patients among hospitals in the west of Scotland.

W G Reeve1, C J Runcie, J Reidy, P G Wallace.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the requirements of an interhospital transfer service for critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective survey of the current functions of a specialist interhospital transfer team from data collected at the time of transfer and from records of intensive care unit.
SETTING: Mobile intensive care unit based at a tertiary referral centre, which serves the west of Scotland. PATIENTS: All critically ill patients (378) transferred between hospitals by the unit from 1986 to 1988.
RESULTS: 365 Patients were transferred by road and 13 by air. There was a wide variation in age (range 6 weeks to 87 years), diagnosis, reason for transfer, support required, and distance travelled. Most patients (232) were transferred for respiratory or cardiovascular support; 100 were trauma cases. 300 Patients (79%) were mechanically ventilated during transfer. No patient died in transit, although the eventual mortality was 28% (105 patients). Mortality was significantly higher in patients transferred from hospitals with intensive care units than from those without (38% (125 patients) v 23% (253); p less than 0.005). IMPLICATIONS: Safe interhospital transfer of critically ill patients is feasible; the high eventual mortality in some patient groups emphasises the need for accurate prediction of outcome if inappropriate transfer is to be avoided. The findings may help in organising secondary transfer services in future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2105781      PMCID: PMC1661973          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6717.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  6 in total

1.  Effects of ambulance transport in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G Waddell; P D Scott; N W Lees; I M Ledingham
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-02-15

2.  Transporting critically ill patients by ambulance: audit by sickness scoring.

Authors:  J F Bion; I H Wilson; P A Taylor
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-16

3.  Provision of facilities for secondary transport of seriously ill patients in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  I H Wright; J C McDonald; P N Rogers; I M Ledingham
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-02-20

4.  The effects of secondary transport on critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Ridley; R Carter
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Stabilization of patients prior to interhospital transfer.

Authors:  C M Olson; M S Jastremski; J P Vilogi; C M Madden; K M Beney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport.

Authors:  J F Bion; S A Edlin; G Ramsay; S McCabe; I M Ledingham
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-17
  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Helicopters.

Authors:  C M Dryden; J A Davidson; J R Dougall; P G Wallace
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Audit of neonatal intensive care transport.

Authors:  A J Leslie; T J Stephenson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Guidelines for resuscitation and transfer of patients with serious head injury.

Authors:  D Gentleman; M Dearden; S Midgley; D Maclean
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-28

4.  Initial assessment and outcome of head injured patients transferred to a regional neurosurgical service: what do we miss?

Authors:  P T Grant; S Shrouder
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-01

5.  Emergency general surgery: impact of distance and rurality on mortality.

Authors:  Jared M Wohlgemut; George Ramsay; Mohamed Bekheit; Neil W Scott; Angus J M Watson; Jan O Jansen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 6.  Secondary transport of the critically ill and injured adult.

Authors:  A Gray; S Bush; S Whiteley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Adverse events occurring during interhospital transfer of the critically ill.

Authors:  P W Barry; C Ralston
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Singh; Russell D MacDonald
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Telemedicine as a tool to provide family conferences and palliative care consultations in critically ill patients at rural health care institutions: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prema R Menon; Renee D Stapleton; Ursula McVeigh; Terry Rabinowitz
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Interhospital transfers by helicopter: the first 50 patients of the Careflight project.

Authors:  S S Kee; C M Ramage; P Mendel; A S Bristow
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.