Prema R Menon1, Renee D Stapleton2, Ursula McVeigh3, Terry Rabinowitz4. 1. University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA prema.menon@vtmednet.org. 2. University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. 3. University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. 4. University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many critically ill patients who transfer from rural hospitals to tertiary care centers (TCCs) have poor prognoses, and family members are unable to discuss patient prognosis and goals of care with TCC providers until after transfer. AIM: Our TCC conducted teleconferences prior to transfer to facilitate early family discussions. DESIGN/ SETTING: We conducted a retrospective review of these telemedicine family conferences among critically ill patients requested for transfer which occurred from December 2008 to December 2009 at our TCC. Outcomes for each patient and detailed descriptions of the conference content were obtained. We also assessed limitations and attitudes and satisfaction with this intervention among clinicians. RESULTS: During the 12-month period, 12 telemedicine consultations were performed. Of these patients, 10 (83%) died in the 30 days following the request for transfer. After the telemedicine consultation, 8 (67%) patients were transferred to our TCC from their respective hospitals, while 4 (33%) patients continued care at their regional hospital and did not transfer. Of the patients who transferred to TCC, 7 (88% of those transferred) returned to their community after a stay at the TCC. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that palliative care consultations can be provided via telemedicine for critically ill patients and that adequate preparation and technical expertise are essential. Although this study is limited by the nature of the retrospective review, it is evident that more research is needed to further assess its applicability, utility, and acceptability.
BACKGROUND: Many critically ill patients who transfer from rural hospitals to tertiary care centers (TCCs) have poor prognoses, and family members are unable to discuss patient prognosis and goals of care with TCC providers until after transfer. AIM: Our TCC conducted teleconferences prior to transfer to facilitate early family discussions. DESIGN/ SETTING: We conducted a retrospective review of these telemedicine family conferences among critically ill patients requested for transfer which occurred from December 2008 to December 2009 at our TCC. Outcomes for each patient and detailed descriptions of the conference content were obtained. We also assessed limitations and attitudes and satisfaction with this intervention among clinicians. RESULTS: During the 12-month period, 12 telemedicine consultations were performed. Of these patients, 10 (83%) died in the 30 days following the request for transfer. After the telemedicine consultation, 8 (67%) patients were transferred to our TCC from their respective hospitals, while 4 (33%) patients continued care at their regional hospital and did not transfer. Of the patients who transferred to TCC, 7 (88% of those transferred) returned to their community after a stay at the TCC. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that palliative care consultations can be provided via telemedicine for critically ill patients and that adequate preparation and technical expertise are essential. Although this study is limited by the nature of the retrospective review, it is evident that more research is needed to further assess its applicability, utility, and acceptability.
Authors: Joan D Penrod; Partha Deb; Cornelia Dellenbaugh; James F Burgess; Carolyn W Zhu; Cindy L Christiansen; Carol A Luhrs; Therese Cortez; Elayne Livote; Veleka Allen; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Young Ho Yun; Myung Kyung Lee; Seon Young Kim; Woo Jin Lee; Kyung Hae Jung; Young Rok Do; Samyong Kim; Dae Seog Heo; Jong Soo Choi; Sang Yoon Park; Hyun Sik Jeong; Jung Hun Kang; Si-Young Kim; Jungsil Ro; Jung Lim Lee; Sook Ryun Park; Sohee Park Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christina Jones; Paul Skirrow; Richard D Griffiths; Gerrald Humphris; Sarah Ingleby; Jane Eddleston; Carl Waldmann; Melanie Gager Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rhea E Powell; Jeffrey M Henstenburg; Grace Cooper; Judd E Hollander; Kristin L Rising Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Julia Driessen; Andro Bonhomme; Woody Chang; David A Nace; Dio Kavalieratos; Subashan Perera; Steven M Handler Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Lawrence Asprec; Craig D Blinderman; Ana Berlin; Mary E Callahan; Eric Widera; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Alexander K Smith; Shunichi Nakagawa Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 2.947