Literature DB >> 1548652

Interhospital transfers by helicopter: the first 50 patients of the Careflight project.

S S Kee1, C M Ramage, P Mendel, A S Bristow.   

Abstract

An interhospital helicopter transfer service was set up using a dedicated helicopter fitted with medical equipment and staffed by anaesthetists. The system proved to be safe and practical. Fifty patients were referred from 38 hospitals throughout the UK, with 84% of transfers preplanned. Patients were transferred a mean distance of 118 miles (range 35-397 miles) and there was no deterioration during transfer as measured by pre and post transfer sickness scores. Twenty-eight per cent of cases could not have been practically transferred by conventional means. The death rate of 20% was lower than that reported for specially equipped and staffed land transfer systems, which may indicate less physiological deterioration in the critically ill compared to road transfer. Dedicated helicopter transfer resulted in a 50% survival rate in patients with a sickness score over 18, a group found not to survive after land transfer. There was no correlation between distance moved and outcome. A helicopter transfer system using suitable equipment and staff is a practical and safe method of moving critically ill patients between hospitals, and may be preferable to land transfer for distances in excess of 25 miles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1548652      PMCID: PMC1293458          DOI: 10.1177/014107689208500111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  18 in total

1.  Land ambulance vs helicopter for interhospital transfer.

Authors:  J Reidy; S Hickey; B Power; P G Wallace
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1990-07

2.  The disadvantages of helicopter transfer.

Authors:  W F de Mello; M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1990-05

3.  Current practice in transferring critically ill patients among hospitals in the west of Scotland.

Authors:  W G Reeve; C J Runcie; J Reidy; P G Wallace
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-13

4.  Mayo Clinic's hospital-based emergency air medical transport service.

Authors:  M B Farnell; J L Sachs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Interhospital transfer of the critically ill patient by helicopter.

Authors:  C Ramage; S Kee; A Bristow
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1990-02

6.  Effects of ambulance transport in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G Waddell; P D Scott; N W Lees; I M Ledingham
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-02-15

7.  Transporting critically ill patients by ambulance: audit by sickness scoring.

Authors:  J F Bion; I H Wilson; P A Taylor
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-16

8.  Predicting deaths among intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  R W Chang; S Jacobs; B Lee; N Pace
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  The impact of a rotorcraft aeromedical emergency care service on trauma mortality.

Authors:  W G Baxt; P Moody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Interhospital transfer of a patient undergoing extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal.

Authors:  S S Kee; J Sedgwick; A Bristow
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Accident and emergency medicine--I.

Authors:  R C Evans; R J Evans
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Audit of neonatal intensive care transport.

Authors:  A J Leslie; T J Stephenson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.747

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.