BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of sepsis is higher in men than in women, it is controversial whether there are sex-based differences in sepsis-associated mortality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hospital mortality is higher in males compared with females with severe sepsis/septic shock who require intensive care. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit (ICU) patients hospitalized (in 98 ICUs in 71 US hospitals and 4 Canadian or Brazilian hospitals) with severe sepsis/septic shock between mid-2003 and 2006, using data from the Cerner Project IMPACT database. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 18,757 ICU patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 53-77 years), including 8702 females (46%). Hospital mortality was higher in female patients compared with male patients (35% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.006). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and processes of care, females had a higher likelihood of hospital mortality than did males (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002). Female patients were less likely than male patients to receive deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86), or hemodialysis catheters (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93). Females were more likely than males to receive red blood cell transfusions (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22) and code status limitations (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of ICU patients, females with severe sepsis/septic shock had a higher risk of dying in the hospital than did males. This difference remained after multivariable adjustment. Significant gender disparities were also found in some aspects of care delivery, but these did not explain the higher mortality in female patients.
BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of sepsis is higher in men than in women, it is controversial whether there are sex-based differences in sepsis-associated mortality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that hospital mortality is higher in males compared with females with severe sepsis/septic shock who require intensive care. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of intensive care unit (ICU) patients hospitalized (in 98 ICUs in 71 US hospitals and 4 Canadian or Brazilian hospitals) with severe sepsis/septic shock between mid-2003 and 2006, using data from the Cerner Project IMPACT database. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 18,757 ICU patients (median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 53-77 years), including 8702 females (46%). Hospital mortality was higher in female patients compared with male patients (35% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.006). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and processes of care, females had a higher likelihood of hospital mortality than did males (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19; P = 0.002). Female patients were less likely than male patients to receive deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86), or hemodialysis catheters (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93). Females were more likely than males to receive red blood cell transfusions (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22) and code status limitations (OR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.18-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of ICU patients, females with severe sepsis/septic shock had a higher risk of dying in the hospital than did males. This difference remained after multivariable adjustment. Significant gender disparities were also found in some aspects of care delivery, but these did not explain the higher mortality in female patients.
Authors: Anand Kumar; Daniel Roberts; Kenneth E Wood; Bruce Light; Joseph E Parrillo; Satendra Sharma; Robert Suppes; Daniel Feinstein; Sergio Zanotti; Leo Taiberg; David Gurka; Aseem Kumar; Mary Cheang Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Thomas L Higgins; Daniel Teres; Wayne S Copes; Brian H Nathanson; Maureen Stark; Andrew A Kramer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Annette M Esper; Marc Moss; Charmaine A Lewis; Rachel Nisbet; David M Mannino; Greg S Martin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jean-Louis Vincent; Yasser Sakr; Charles L Sprung; V Marco Ranieri; Konrad Reinhart; Herwig Gerlach; Rui Moreno; Jean Carlet; Jean-Roger Le Gall; Didier Payen Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gerald C Ihra; Judith Lehberger; Helene Hochrieser; Peter Bauer; Rene Schmutz; Barbara Metnitz; Philipp G H Metnitz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Sheetal Gandotra; James Lovato; Douglas Case; Rita N Bakhru; Kevin Gibbs; Michael Berry; D Clark Files; Peter E Morris Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2019-04
Authors: MengQi Zhang; Joshua Montroy; Rahul Sharma; Dean A Fergusson; Asher A Mendelson; Kimberly F Macala; Stephane L Bourque; Jared M Schlechte; Mikaela K Eng; Braedon McDonald; Sean E Gill; Kirsten M Fiest; Patricia C Liaw; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-06-14