Sheetal Gandotra1, James Lovato2, Douglas Case2, Rita N Bakhru3,4, Kevin Gibbs3,4, Michael Berry5, D Clark Files3,4, Peter E Morris6. 1. 1 Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama. 2. 2 Department of Biostatistical Sciences. 3. 3 Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Immunologic Disease. 4. 4 Wake Forest Critical Illness Injury and Recovery Research Center, and. 5. 5 Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and. 6. 6 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Survivorship from critical illness has improved; however, factors mediating the functional recovery of persons experiencing a critical illness remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify groups of acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors with similar patterns of physical function recovery after discharge and to determine the characteristics associated with group membership in each physical function trajectory group. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, using group-based trajectory modeling to identify distinct subgroups of patients with similar physical function recovery patterns after ARF. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to determine which variables were associated with trajectory membership. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables jointly associated with trajectory group membership. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients enrolled in a trial evaluating standardized rehabilitation therapy in patients with ARF and discharged alive (NCT00976833) were included in this analysis. Physical function was quantified using the Short Physical Performance Battery at hospital discharge and 2, 4, and 6 months after enrollment. Latent class analysis of the Short Physical Performance Battery scores identified four trajectory groups. These groups differ in both the degree and rate of physical function recovery. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed using covariates that have been previously identified in the literature as influencing recovery after critical illness. By multinomial logistic regression, age (P < 0.001), female sex (P = 0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (P = 0.003), and continuous intravenous sedation days (P = 0.004) were the variables that jointly influenced trajectory group membership. Participants in the trajectory demonstrating most rapid and complete functional recovery consisted of younger females with fewer continuous sedation days and a shorter LOS. The participant trajectory that failed to functionally recover consisted of older patients with greater sedation time and the longest LOS. CONCLUSIONS: We identified distinct trajectories of physical function recovery after critical illness. Age, sex, continuous sedation time, and ICU length of stay impact the trajectory of functional recovery after critical illness. Further examination of these groups may assist in clinical trial design to tailor interventions to specific subgroups.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Survivorship from critical illness has improved; however, factors mediating the functional recovery of persons experiencing a critical illness remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVES: To identify groups of acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors with similar patterns of physical function recovery after discharge and to determine the characteristics associated with group membership in each physical function trajectory group. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, using group-based trajectory modeling to identify distinct subgroups of patients with similar physical function recovery patterns after ARF. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to determine which variables were associated with trajectory membership. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables jointly associated with trajectory group membership. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients enrolled in a trial evaluating standardized rehabilitation therapy in patients with ARF and discharged alive (NCT00976833) were included in this analysis. Physical function was quantified using the Short Physical Performance Battery at hospital discharge and 2, 4, and 6 months after enrollment. Latent class analysis of the Short Physical Performance Battery scores identified four trajectory groups. These groups differ in both the degree and rate of physical function recovery. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed using covariates that have been previously identified in the literature as influencing recovery after critical illness. By multinomial logistic regression, age (P < 0.001), female sex (P = 0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) (P = 0.003), and continuous intravenous sedation days (P = 0.004) were the variables that jointly influenced trajectory group membership. Participants in the trajectory demonstrating most rapid and complete functional recovery consisted of younger females with fewer continuous sedation days and a shorter LOS. The participant trajectory that failed to functionally recover consisted of older patients with greater sedation time and the longest LOS. CONCLUSIONS: We identified distinct trajectories of physical function recovery after critical illness. Age, sex, continuous sedation time, and ICU length of stay impact the trajectory of functional recovery after critical illness. Further examination of these groups may assist in clinical trial design to tailor interventions to specific subgroups.
Authors: Samuel M Brown; Emily L Wilson; Angela P Presson; Victor D Dinglas; Tom Greene; Ramona O Hopkins; Dale M Needham Journal: Thorax Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Allan Garland; Neal V Dawson; Irene Altmann; Charles L Thomas; Russell S Phillips; Joel Tsevat; Norman A Desbiens; Paul E Bellamy; William A Knaus; Alfred F Connors Journal: Chest Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Dale M Needham; Victor D Dinglas; Peter E Morris; James C Jackson; Catherine L Hough; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Amy W Wozniak; Elizabeth Colantuoni; E Wesley Ely; Todd W Rice; Ramona O Hopkins Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Theodore J Iwashyna; Carol L Hodgson; David Pilcher; Michael Bailey; Allison van Lint; Shaila Chavan; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Margaret S Herridge; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matté; George Tomlinson; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Andrew Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Paul Kudlow; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky; Angela M Cheung Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simon R Walker; Ranveer Brar; Frederick Eng; Paul Komenda; Claudio Rigatto; Bhanu Prasad; Clara J Bohm; Leroy J Storsley; Navdeep Tangri Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2015-09-05
Authors: Thomas R Martin; Rachel L Zemans; Lorraine B Ware; Eric P Schmidt; David W H Riches; Lisa Bastarache; Carolyn S Calfee; Tushar J Desai; Susanne Herold; Catherine L Hough; Mark R Looney; Michael A Matthay; Nuala Meyer; Samir M Parikh; Troy Stevens; B Taylor Thompson Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 7.748
Authors: E Zampogna; G B Migliori; R Centis; F Cherubino; C Facchetti; D Feci; G Palmiotto; P Pignatti; L Saderi; G Sotgiu; A Spanevello; M Zappa; D Visca Journal: Pulmonology Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Jennifer R A Jones; Sue Berney; Michael J Berry; D Clark Files; David M Griffith; Luke A McDonald; Peter E Morris; Marc Moss; Amy Nordon-Craft; Timothy Walsh; Ian Gordon; Amalia Karahalios; Zudin Puthucheary; Linda Denehy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Robert J J van Gassel; Michelle R Baggerman; Marcel C G van de Poll Journal: Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 3.620
Authors: Zudin A Puthucheary; Jochen S Gensichen; Aylin S Cakiroglu; Richard Cashmore; Lara Edbrooke; Christoph Heintze; Konrad Neumann; Tobias Wollersheim; Linda Denehy; Konrad F R Schmidt Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Chunxue Bai; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Jordi Rello; George A Alba; Leo C Ginns; Jerry A Krishnan; Robert Rogers; Elisabeth Bendstrup; Pierre-Regis Burgel; James D Chalmers; Abigail Chua; Kristina A Crothers; Abhijit Duggal; Yeon Wook Kim; John G Laffey; Carlos M Luna; Michael S Niederman; Ganesh Raghu; Julio A Ramirez; Jordi Riera; Oriol Roca; Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu; Antoni Torres; Richard R Watkins; Miriam Barrecheguren; Mirko Belliato; Hassan A Chami; Rongchang Chen; Gustavo A Cortes-Puentes; Charles Delacruz; Margaret M Hayes; Leo M A Heunks; Steven R Holets; Catherine L Hough; Sugeet Jagpal; Kyeongman Jeon; Takeshi Johkoh; May M Lee; Janice Liebler; Gerry N McElvaney; Ari Moskowitz; Richard A Oeckler; Iñigo Ojanguren; Anthony O'Regan; Mathias W Pletz; Chin Kook Rhee; Marcus J Schultz; Enrico Storti; Charlie Strange; Carey C Thomson; Francesca J Torriani; Xun Wang; Wim Wuyts; Tao Xu; Dawei Yang; Ziqiang Zhang; Kevin C Wilson Journal: Eur Respir Rev Date: 2020-10-05