| Literature DB >> 21055819 |
Victor H Hu1, Patrick Massae, Helen A Weiss, Ian A Cree, Paul Courtright, David C W Mabey, Robin L Bailey, Matthew J Burton.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) appearances of the tarsal conjunctiva in trachoma compared with the appearance of healthy conjunctiva and to develop grading systems for IVCM examination of the tarsal conjunctiva for use in future studies on trachoma and other conjunctival diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21055819 PMCID: PMC3267042 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ophthalmology ISSN: 0161-6420 Impact factor: 12.079
Figure 1Normal tarsal conjunctiva. Images are 400×400 μm with the bar representing 50 μm. A, Superficial epithelial cell nuclei. B, Inflammatory cell nuclei; note heterogeneity in size and shape (arrow). C, Dendritic cells (arrow). D, Superficial blood vessels.
Figure 4Active disease in adults with conjunctival scarring. Images are 400×400μm with the bar representing 50 μm. A, Increased inflammatory cell infiltrate. B, Follicular structure. C, Activated DCs. D, Cystic lacunae. DC = dendritiform cells.
Conjunctival Inflammation Grading System for In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
| Feature | Grading Description |
|---|---|
| Inflammatory infiltrate | Mean inflammatory cell density of 3 randomly selected volume scans |
| DCs | Present or absent: to be present, the mean number of DCs per volume scan needs to be ≥1 |
| Tissue edema | Present or absent: present if seen in any volume scan |
| Papillae | Present or absent: present if seen in any volume scan |
DC = dendritiform cells.
Cell density is measured with the RCM software, for which it is suggested that a minimum of 50 cells is counted per field. See text for explanation of why 3 scans are selected. The individual scan with the largest density of cells from within the volume scan is used to calculate the density.
The largest number of DCs in any individual scan in a particular volume scan is used.
Figure 6Conjunctival connective tissue organization/scarring grading system for IVCM. Images are 400×400 μm. A, Normal: homogenous, amorphous appearance with occasional fine, wispy strand. B, Grade 1: Heterogeneous appearance with poorly defined clumps or bands present. C, Grade 2: clearly defined bands of tissue that constitute <50% of the area of the scan. D, Grade 3: clearly defined bands or sheets of tissue that constitute ≥50% of the area of the scan and in which striations are visible. If different grades of scarring are seen within a particular volume scan, then the highest grade is recorded. The connective tissue that is graded needs to be separate from that associated with the vascular tissue; if this is not possible then the scan is considered ungradable. IVCM = in vivo confocal microscopy.