| Literature DB >> 21920608 |
Victor H Hu1, Helen A Weiss, Patrick Massae, Paul Courtright, William Makupa, David C W Mabey, Robin L Bailey, Matthew J Burton.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the tissue and cellular changes found in trachomatous scarring (TS) and inflammation using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21920608 PMCID: PMC3267045 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ophthalmology ISSN: 0161-6420 Impact factor: 12.079
Figure 2In vivo confocal microscopy grading system of inflammatory features. Images are 400×400 μm. A, Inflammatory infiltrate: seen as multiple bright white nuclei. The mean inflammatory cell density of 3 randomly selected volume scans is calculated. The individual scan with the highest density of cells from within the volume scan is used. B, Dendritiform cells: graded as present or absent. To be present, the mean number of DCs per volume scan needs to be ≥1. The largest number of DCs in any individual scan in a volume scan is used for measurement. A mean number of ≥1 is used to differentiate occasional DCs seen in scans of otherwise normal subjects. C, Tissue edema: seen as multiple black empty spaces. Graded as present or absent (present if seen in any volume scan). D, Papillae: seen as elevations with a central vascular network. Graded as present or absent (present if seen in any volume scan).
Figure 3In vivo confocal microscopy grading system for conjunctival connective tissue organization. Images are 400×400 μm. If different grades of scarring are seen within a particular volume scan, then the highest grade is recorded. The connective tissue that is graded needs to be separate from that associated with the vascular tissue; if this is not possible, then the scan is considered ungradable.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Trachomatous Scarring Study Participants and Age-Adjusted Associations with Conjunctival Scarring
| Parameter | Cases N = 363 | Controls N = 363 | Age-Adjusted Association with Scarring | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | (%) | n | (%) | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | 222 | (61.2) | 242 | (66.7) | 1.00 | – | |
| Male | 141 | (38.8) | 121 | (33.3) | 1.19 | 0.83–1.71 | 0.34 |
| Age (year groups) | 2.20 | 1.94–2.50 | <0.001 | ||||
| 18–25 | 29 | (8.0) | 117 | (32.2) | |||
| 25–35 | 53 | (14.6) | 114 | (31.4) | |||
| 35–45 | 65 | (17.9) | 87 | (24.0) | |||
| 45–55 | 81 | (22.3) | 28 | (7.7) | |||
| 55–65 | 58 | (16.0) | 9 | (2.5) | |||
| > 65 | 77 | (21.2) | 8 | (2.2) | |||
| Age (yrs) [median, IQR] | 49.7 | 36.7–62.7 | 29.2 | 22.2–39.2 | |||
| Formal education | 0.001 | ||||||
| None | 250 | (69.4) | 166 | (46.1) | 1.00 | – | – |
| 1–7 yrs | 106 | (29.4) | 177 | (49.2) | 0.57 | 0.40–0.81 | |
| > 7 yrs | 4 | (1.1) | 17 | (4.7) | 0.25 | 0.07–0.88 | |
| BMI | 0.48 | ||||||
| Underweight | 55 | (15.3) | 30 | (8.4) | 1.39 | 0.79–2.44 | |
| Normal | 259 | (72.0) | 287 | (80.2) | 1.00 | – | – |
| Overweight/obese | 46 | (12.8) | 41 | (11.5) | 1.14 | 0.68–1.92 | |
| Scarring grade | |||||||
| S0 | – | – | 363 | (100) | |||
| S1a | 0 | 0 | – | – | |||
| S1b | 188 | (51.8) | – | – | |||
| S1c | 128 | (35.3) | − | − | |||
| S2 | 34 | (9.4) | – | – | |||
| S3 | 13 | (3.6) | − | − | |||
| Papillary inflammation grade | |||||||
| P0 | 81 | (22.3) | 346 | (95.3) | |||
| P1 | 189 | (52.1) | 17 | (4.7) | |||
| P2 | 85 | (23.4) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| P3 | 8 | (2.2) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| Follicles grade | |||||||
| F0 | 358 | (98.6) | 358 | (99.7) | |||
| F1 | 2 | (0.6) | 1 | (0.3) | |||
| F2 | 1 | (0.3) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| F3 | 2 | (0.6) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; IQR = interquartile range; OR = odds ratio.
The result shown is the increase in the OR with each increase in age group category.
Primary schooling in Tanzania is completed after 7 years.
Categories from the National Institutes of Health.
All of the controls had no scarring (grade 0), and all of the cases had scarring grade ≥S1b.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Trachomatous Trichiasis Study Participants and Associations with Conjunctival Scarring
| Cases N = 34 | Controls N = 33 | Association with Scarring | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | n | (%) | n | (%) | OR | 95% CI | |
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | 23 | (67.7) | 15 | (45.5) | 1.00 | – | |
| Male | 11 | (32.3) | 18 | (54.5) | 2.61 | 0.93–7.34 | 0.06 |
| Age (year groups) | 1.62 | 0.90–2.95 | 0.11 | ||||
| 18–25 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| 25–35 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| 35–45 | 1 | (6.9) | 2 | (6.1) | |||
| 45–55 | 1 | (20.7) | 7 | (21.2) | |||
| 55–65 | 10 | (20.7) | 6 | (18.2) | |||
| > 65 | 22 | (51.7) | 18 | (54.6) | |||
| Age (yrs) [median, IQR] | 68.5 | 61.0–80.0 | 70.0 | 53.1–78.1 | |||
| Formal education | <0.001 | ||||||
| None | 28 | (87.5) | 4 | (13.3) | 1.00 | – | – |
| 1–7 yrs | 4 | (12.5) | 18 | (60.0) | 0.02 | 0.00–0.12 | |
| >7 yrs | 0 | (0.0) | 8 | (26.7) | 0.02 | 0.00–0.18 | |
| BMI | Data not collected | ||||||
| Scarring grade | |||||||
| S0 | – | – | 33 | (100) | |||
| S1a | 0 | 0 | – | – | |||
| S1b | 0 | 0 | – | – | |||
| S1c | 6 | (17.7) | – | – | |||
| S2 | 4 | (11.8) | – | – | |||
| S3 | 24 | (70.6) | – | – | |||
| Papillary inflammation grade | |||||||
| P0 | 4 | (11.8) | 31 | (93.9) | |||
| P1 | 5 | (14.7) | 1 | (3.0) | |||
| P2 | 17 | (50.0) | 1 | (3.0) | |||
| P3 | 8 | (23.5) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| Follicles grade | |||||||
| F0 | 34 | (100.0) | 33 | (100.0) | |||
| F1 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| F2 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
| F3 | 0 | (0.0) | 0 | (0.0) | |||
BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; IQR = interquartile range; OR = odds ratio.
The result shown is the increase in the OR with each increase in age group category.
Primary schooling in Tanzania is completed after 7 years.
All of the controls had no scarring (grade 0), and all of the cases had scarring grade ≥S1c.
In vivo confocal microscopy findings from the Trachomatous Scaring and Trachomatous Trichiasis Studies and associations with conjunctival scarring
| Parameter | Cases | Controls | Association with scarring | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | ||||||
| N = 328 | N = 319 | ||||||
| Mean inflammatory infiltrate (cells/mm2) [mean, 95%CI] | 875 | 832–919 | 674 | 640–707 | |||
| Dendritiform cells present, n(%) | 50 | (15.2) | 7 | (2.2) | 4.10 | 1.71–9.85 | 0.002 |
| Tissue edema present, n(%) | 22 | (6.7) | 9 | (2.8) | 3.77 | 1.53–9.26 | 0.004 |
| Papillae present, n(%) | 110 | (33.5) | 129 | (40.4) | 1.14 | 0.78–1.66 | 0.49 |
| N = 314 | N = 302 | ||||||
| Connective Tissue Organization grade, n(%) | <0.001 | ||||||
| 0–1 | 81 | (25.8) | 238 | (78.8) | 1.00 | – | |
| 1–2 | 178 | (56.7) | 64 | (21.2) | 6.2 | 4.1–9.4 | |
| 2–3 | 55 | (17.5) | 0 | (0.0) | 107.4 | 14.2–813.7 | |
| Mean connective tissue organization score (mean, 95%CI) | |||||||
| 1.48 | 1.41–1.56 | 0.77 | 0.71–0.82 | ||||
| N = 28 | N = 26 | ||||||
| Mean inflammatory infiltrate (cells/mm2) [mean, 95%CI] | 1572 | 1174–1972 | 1252 | 1037–1467 | 0.11 | ||
| Dendritiform cells present, n(%) | 16 | (61.5) | 1 | (3.6) | 43.20 | 5.05–369.6 | 0.001 |
| Tissue edema present, n(%) | 10 | (38.5) | 0 | (0.0) | 16.9 | 1.97–144.4 | 0.01 |
| Papillae present, n(%) | 0 | (0.0) | 3 | (10.7) | 0.33 | 0.03–3.43 | 0.36 |
| N = 26 | N = 25 | ||||||
| Connective Tissue Organization grade, n(%) | <0.001 | ||||||
| 0–1 | 2 | (8.0) | 24 | (92.3) | 1.00 | – | |
| 1–2 | 6 | (24.0) | 2 | (7.7) | 72.0 | 5.6–933.0 | |
| 2–3 | 17 | (68.0) | 0 | (0.0) | 204.0 | 17.1–2434.9 | |
| Mean connective tissue organization score (mean, 95%CI) | |||||||
| 2.29 | 1.94–2.64 | 0.59 | 0.41–0.77 | <0.001 | |||
OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence intervals; TS = Trachomatous Scarring; TT = Trachomatous Trichiasis.
There are different N numbers as not all subjects had images which could be graded.
Age-adjusted for the TS Study.
Age-adjusted difference between cases and controls.
If a cell contained 0 then a participant was moved up a category in order to be able to generate a representative odds ratio.