Literature DB >> 21054366

Balancing access to health data and privacy: a review of the issues and approaches for the future.

Julia Lane1, Claudia Schur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic increase in the types of microdata, and this holds great promise for health services research. However, legislative efforts to protect individual privacy have reduced the flow of health care data for research purposes and increased costs and delays, affecting the quality of analysis. AIM: This paper provides an overview of the challenges raised by concerns about data confidentiality in the context of health services research, the current methodologies used to ensure data security, and a description of one successful approach to balancing access and privacy. Materials and Methods. We analyze the issues of access and privacy using a conceptual framework based on balancing the risk of reidentification with the utility associated with data analysis. The guiding principle should be to generate released data that are as close to the maximum acceptable risk as possible. HIPAA and other privacy measures can perhaps be seen as having had the effect of lowering the "maximum acceptable risk" level and rendering some data unreleasable.
RESULTS: We discuss the levels of risk and utility associated with different types of data used in health services research and the ability to link data from multiple sources as well as current models of data sharing and their limitations. DISCUSSION: One particularly compelling approach is to establish a remote access "data enclave," where statistical protections are applied to the data, technical protections ensure compliance with data-sharing requirements, and operational controls limit researchers' access to the data they need for their specific research questions.
CONCLUSION: We recommend reducing delays in access to data for research, increasing the use of remote access data enclaves, and disseminating knowledge and promulgating standards for best practices related to data protection. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21054366      PMCID: PMC2965886          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: a practical guide for researchers.

Authors:  Patrick P Gunn; Allen M Fremont; Melissa Bottrell; Lisa R Shugarman; Jolene Galegher; Tora Bikson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Using survey data to estimate prescription drug costs.

Authors:  M L Berk; C L Schur; P Mohr
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Sensitivity of household reported medical conditions in the medical expenditure panel survey.

Authors:  Steven Machlin; Joel Cohen; Anne Elixhauser; Karen Beauregard; Claudia Steiner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Sexuality: measures of partnerships, practices, attitudes, and problems in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Study.

Authors:  Linda J Waite; Edward O Laumann; Aniruddha Das; L Philip Schumm
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  15 in total

1.  Multiple chronic conditions and disabilities: implications for health services research and data demands.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Meeting the privacy requirements for the development of a multi-centre patient registry in Canada: the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry.

Authors:  Vanessa K Noonan; Nancy P Thorogood; Phalgun B Joshi; Michael G Fehlings; B Catharine Craven; Gary Linassi; Daryl R Fourney; Brian K Kwon; Christopher S Bailey; Eve C Tsai; Brian M Drew; Henry Ahn; Deborah Tsui; Marcel F Dvorak
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2013-05

3.  A direct comparison of theory-driven and machine learning prediction of suicide: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katherine M Schafer; Grace Kennedy; Austin Gallyer; Philip Resnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic data sharing and privacy.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani; John K Yue; Sourabh Sharma; Geoffrey T Manley; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2015-01

5.  Diabetes Technology Meeting 2021.

Authors:  Nicole Y Xu; Kevin T Nguyen; Ashley Y DuBord; John Pickup; Jennifer L Sherr; Hazhir Teymourian; Eda Cengiz; Barry H Ginsberg; Claudio Cobelli; David Ahn; Riccardo Bellazzi; B Wayne Bequette; Laura Gandrud Pickett; Linda Parks; Elias K Spanakis; Umesh Masharani; Halis K Akturk; John S Melish; Sarah Kim; Gu Eon Kang; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02

6.  Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups.

Authors:  Laura A Mamo; Dennis K Browe; Holly C Logan; Katherine K Kim
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 7.  Privacy in the digital world: medical and health data outside of HIPAA protections.

Authors:  Tasha Glenn; Scott Monteith
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Health data use, stewardship, and governance: ongoing gaps and challenges: a report from AMIA's 2012 Health Policy Meeting.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Meryl Bloomrosen; Patti FlatelyBrennan; Christopher G Chute; Jim Cimino; Don E Detmer; Margo Edmunds; Peter J Embi; Melissa M Goldstein; William Ed Hammond; Gail M Keenan; Steve Labkoff; Shawn Murphy; Charlie Safran; Stuart Speedie; Howard Strasberg; Freda Temple; Adam B Wilcox
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health.

Authors:  Willem G van Panhuis; Proma Paul; Claudia Emerson; John Grefenstette; Richard Wilder; Abraham J Herbst; David Heymann; Donald S Burke
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  "You hoped we would sleep walk into accepting the collection of our data": controversies surrounding the UK care.data scheme and their wider relevance for biomedical research.

Authors:  Sigrid Sterckx; Vojin Rakic; Julian Cockbain; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.