Literature DB >> 23968640

Meeting the privacy requirements for the development of a multi-centre patient registry in Canada: the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry.

Vanessa K Noonan1, Nancy P Thorogood, Phalgun B Joshi, Michael G Fehlings, B Catharine Craven, Gary Linassi, Daryl R Fourney, Brian K Kwon, Christopher S Bailey, Eve C Tsai, Brian M Drew, Henry Ahn, Deborah Tsui, Marcel F Dvorak.   

Abstract

Privacy legislation addresses concerns regarding the privacy of personal information; however, its interpretation by research ethics boards has resulted in significant challenges to the collection, management, use and disclosure of personal health information for multi-centre research studies. This paper describes the strategy used to develop the national Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) in accordance with privacy statutes and benchmarked against best practices. An analysis of the regional and national privacy legislation was conducted to determine the requirements for each of the 31 local RHSCIR sites and the national RHSCIR office. A national privacy and security framework was created for RHSCIR that includes a governance structure, standard operating procedures, training processes, physical and technical security and privacy impact assessments. The framework meets a high-water mark in ensuring privacy and security of personal health information nationally and may assist in the development of other national or international research initiatives.
Copyright © 2013 Longwoods Publishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968640      PMCID: PMC3999529     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  14 in total

1.  Ethics and privacy issues of a practice-based surveillance system: need for a national-level institutional research ethics board and consent standards.

Authors:  Jyoti A Kotecha; Donna Manca; Anita Lambert-Lanning; Karim Keshavjee; Neil Drummond; Marshall Godwin; Michelle Greiver; Wayne Putnam; Marie-Thérèse Lussier; Richard Birtwhistle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards.

Authors:  J de Champlain; J Patenaude
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  An architecture for privacy in a networked health information environment.

Authors:  Carol Diamond; Melissa Goldstein; David Lansky; Stefaan Verhulst
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Research ethics review: do it once and do it well.

Authors:  Paul Hébert; Raphael Saginur
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Data protection and the promotion of health research: if the laws are not the problem, then what is?

Authors:  Donald J Willison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-02

6.  A globally optimal k-anonymity method for the de-identification of health data.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Fida Kamal Dankar; Romeo Issa; Elizabeth Jonker; Daniel Amyot; Elise Cogo; Jean-Pierre Corriveau; Mark Walker; Sadrul Chowdhury; Regis Vaillancourt; Tyson Roffey; Jim Bottomley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Personal privacy and public health: potential impacts of privacy legislation on health research in Canada.

Authors:  M Anne Harris; Adrian R Levy; Kay E Teschke
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

8.  The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry.

Authors:  V K Noonan; B K Kwon; L Soril; M G Fehlings; R J Hurlbert; A Townson; M Johnson; M F Dvorak
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.

Authors:  D J Willison; C Emerson; K V Szala-Meneok; E Gibson; L Schwartz; K M Weisbaum; F Fournier; K Brazil; M D Coughlin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 10.  Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic review.

Authors:  Michelle E Kho; Mark Duffett; Donald J Willison; Deborah J Cook; Melissa C Brouwers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-03-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Methylprednisolone for the Treatment of Patients with Acute Spinal Cord Injuries: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study from a Canadian Multi-Center Spinal Cord Injury Registry.

Authors:  Nathan Evaniew; Vanessa K Noonan; Nader Fallah; Brian K Kwon; Carly S Rivers; Henry Ahn; Christopher S Bailey; Sean D Christie; Daryl R Fourney; R John Hurlbert; A G Linassi; Michael G Fehlings; Marcel F Dvorak
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  A framework for value-creating learning health systems.

Authors:  Matthew Menear; Marc-André Blanchette; Olivier Demers-Payette; Denis Roy
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2019-08-09

3.  Methods for development of structure, process and outcome indicators for prioritized spinal cord injury rehabilitation Domains: SCI-High Project.

Authors:  B Catharine Craven; S Mohammad Alavinia; Matheus J Wiest; Farnoosh Farahani; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Gaya Jeyathevan; Maryam Omidvar; Mark T Bayley
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Central Recruitment: A process for engaging and recruiting individuals with spinal cord injury/disease in research at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute.

Authors:  B Catharine Craven; Louise Brisbois; Chelsea Pelletier; Julia Rybkina; Ann Heesters; Mary Caroline Verrier
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Transforming SCI rehabilitation care through innovation.

Authors:  B Catharine Craven; Kristin Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.