Literature DB >> 21053892

Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Brett Levine1, David Fabi, Carl Deirmengian.   

Abstract

The use of digital radiography is becoming more prevalent in orthopedics. This transition impacts the ability to preoperatively plan for implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This article reports on the clinical success of digital templating using the Advanced Case Plan (Stryker Imaging, Flower Mound, Texas) system in primary THA and TKA. Digital radiographs of 269 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA (93 cases) or TKA (176 cases) were templated using the Advanced Case Plan digital software package. A 25.4-mm metallic sphere was used as a calibrating marker. Anteroposterior hip and lateral knee radiographs were digitally templated preoperatively and compared to the actual size of the implants at the time of surgery. The accuracy of calibrating images using the metallic sphere was validated by measuring the diameter of femoral heads on 25 postoperative hip radiographs. Digital templating was accurate in predicting the correct implant size in 58.5% of THAs and 66% of TKAs. In 93% of THAs and 98.5% of TKAs, preoperative templating was within 1 size of the final implant. There were no cases in which the predicted implant size varied from the final components by >2 sizes. Calibrating the image using the metallic sphere marker was found to be highly accurate, predicting the correct femoral head size within 1.5 mm in all 25 cases (7 hemiarthroplasties and 18 THAs). Digital templating is an effective means for predicting the size of THA and TKA components, thus remaining a viable option as we transition into the modern era of digital radiography. Future studies will evaluate interobserver reliability and the impact of level of training on templating accuracy. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21053892     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100924-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  19 in total

1.  The accuracy and reliability of pre-operative templating in revision total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of analogue and digital methods.

Authors:  Neil Prakash Morgan Jain; Paul Michael Guyver; Michael James Hayden McCarthy; James Press; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17

2.  Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Shane M Davis; Christianne J Lane; Ryan C Koonce; Andrew P Hartman; Kenneth Ball; James C Esch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-09-07

3.  [Posterior lumbar interbody fusion implants. Software assisted planning--preliminary results].

Authors:  M Rickert; M Arabmotlagh; C Carstens; E Behrbalk; M Rauschmann; C Fleege
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Pre-operative templating for knee arthroplasty shows low accuracy with standard X-rays.

Authors:  Nelson Hiroyuki Miyabe Ooka; André Luiz Siqueira Campos; Vitor Mudesto da Fonseca; Luis Edmundo Oliveira Rodrigues; Edmilson Barbosa Filho; José Sérgio Franco; Rodrigo Satamini Pires E Albuquerque; Vinicius Schott Gameiro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient-specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; B Boonen; B Kerens; B Jong; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; Marion Heijmans; Rein Vos; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Daphne A L Schoenmakers; Rob Sollie; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A computer simulation study for preserving the tibial posterior slope in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Mitsuru Hanada; Kensuke Hotta; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-05-19

9.  Fallacies of CT based component size prediction in total knee arthroplasty - Are patient specific instruments the answer?

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay; Midhun Krishnan; Amit K Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-10

10.  Total Knee Replacement Sizing: Shoe Size Is a Better Predictor for Implant Size than Body Height.

Authors:  Sarah Trainor; Jamie Collins; Hannah Mulvey; Wolfgang Fitz
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.