Literature DB >> 21053740

Propensity score-matched analysis of aortic valve replacement by mini-thoracotomy.

Elfriede Ruttmann1, Thomas S Gilhofer, Hanno Ulmer, Orest Chevtchik, Alfred Kocher, Roland Schistek, Guenther Laufert, Ludwig C Mueller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Although minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) through an anterolateral mini-thoracotomy has been shown to reduce surgical trauma, the technique is utilized only at a few selected heart surgery centers. The study aim was to demonstrate the implementation of a MIAVR program at the Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.
METHODS: Between October 2006 and January 2009, a total of 315 patients underwent elective isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Of these patients, 87 (27.6%) received MIAVR, while the remainder (n = 228) underwent 'conventional' AVR by full sternotomy. In the MIAVR group, 76 patients (87%) were cannulated via the femoral artery. The mean EuroSCORE was 5.7 +/- 2.2 in the MIAVR group, and 6.7 +/- 2.9 in the AVR group (p < 0.001). Propensity score matching was used to reduce the impact of treatment selection in the comparison of MIAVR with conventional AVR. The propensity score was used to yield two matched groups by means of a 1:1 sample matching.
RESULTS: The total operative, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were significantly longer in the MIAVR group compared to the matched AVR group. The actuarial one-year survival was 96% in the MIAVR group, and 98% in the propensity-matched AVR group (p = 0.57). Reoperation due to bleeding was necessary in 4.6% of the MIAVR group (four patients, three by mini-thoracotomy) compared to 5.7% in the matched AVR group (n = 5; p = 0.38). A total of six MIAVR patients (6.9%) had complications from the cannulated groin, predominantly lymphatic fistula formation. Additionally, there was a trend towards a higher rate of renal insufficiency in the MIAVR group (p = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: MIAVR can be safely implemented as routine cardiac surgery procedure, although the operative times are significantly longer. The early postoperative outcome was equal to that of the sternotomy approach, but postoperative complications were predominantly associated with femoral cannulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21053740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  13 in total

1.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.

Authors:  Daniyar Gilmanov; Marco Solinas; Pier Andrea Farneti; Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo; Enkel Kallushi; Filippo Santarelli; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

2.  Perceval S aortic valve implantation in mini-invasive surgery: the simple sutureless solution.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Steffen Pfeiffer; Giovanni Concistrè; Theodor Fischlein
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-22

3.  Minimally invasive primary aortic valve surgery: the OLV Aalst experience.

Authors:  Johan van der Merwe; Filip Casselman; Bernard Stockman; Frank Van Praet; Roel Beelen; Lieven Maene; Yvette Vermeulen; Ivan Degrieck
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Ministernotomy or minithoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ashleigh Xie; Yi-Chin Tsai; Deborah Black; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 5.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Miceli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

6.  Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Elisa Mikus; Simone Calvi; Alberto Tripodi; Luca Dozza; Mauro Lamarra; Mauro Del Giglio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 7.  Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Bilal H Kirmani; Sion G Jones; S C Malaisrie; Darryl A Chung; Richard Jnn Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-10

8.  Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kei Woldendorp; Mathew P Doyle; Paul G Bannon; Martin Misfeld; Tristan D Yan; Giuseppe Santarpino; Paolo Berretta; Marco Di Eusanio; Bart Meuris; Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo; Pierluigi Stefàno; Niccolò Marchionni; Jacqueline K Olive; Tom C Nguyen; Marco Solinas; Giacomo Bianchi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

9.  A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.

Authors:  Michael E Bowdish; Dawn S Hui; John D Cleveland; Wendy J Mack; Raina Sinha; Rupesh Ranjan; Robbin G Cohen; Craig J Baker; Mark J Cunningham; Mark L Barr; Vaughn A Starnes
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Right anterior mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Mauro Del Giglio; Elisa Mikus; Roberto Nerla; Antonio Micari; Simone Calvi; Alberto Tripodi; Gianluca Campo; Elisa Maietti; Fausto Castriota; Alberto Cremonesi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.