Literature DB >> 21052796

Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine.

Zhen Wang1, Bin Lu, Lei Chen, Jiang Chang.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate local response to a bioactive glass based composite putty (NovaBone Putty) in a vertebral body defect model in sheep, as compared to NovaBone, a bioactive glass particulate. Two time periods were used for the study, 6 and 12 weeks. Empty defects were also used as a control. In comparing the three test groups, the relative amount of new bone for both grafted defects was substantially greater than for the empty controls (P < 0.05). At 6 weeks, the bone formation was 42% for NovaBone Putty, 27% for NovaBone and 1.2% for the ungrafted empty defect. At 12 weeks, the bone formation was 51.4% for NovaBone Putty, 47.3% for NovaBone and 5.1% for the empty defect. NovaBone Putty, the test material, had greater bone content than the NovaBone, both of which were significantly greater than the empty control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21052796     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4175-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  17 in total

1.  Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass 45S5 dissolution.

Authors:  I D Xynos; A J Edgar; L D Buttery; L L Hench; J M Polak
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-05

2.  Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical-size cancellous defects.

Authors:  D L Wheeler; E J Eschbach; R G Hoellrich; M J Montfort; D L Chamberland
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis.

Authors:  I D Xynos; A J Edgar; L D Buttery; L L Hench; J M Polak
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2000-09-24       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Particulate bioglass compared with hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute.

Authors:  H Oonishi; S Kushitani; E Yasukawa; H Iwaki; L L Hench; J Wilson; E Tsuji; T Sugihara
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.

Authors:  L L Hench; H A Paschall
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1973

6.  Solution effects on the surface reactions of a bioactive glass.

Authors:  M R Filgueiras; G La Torre; L L Hench
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-04

7.  Histological and biochemical evaluation of osteoblasts cultured on bioactive glass, hydroxylapatite, titanium alloy, and stainless steel.

Authors:  W C Vrouwenvelder; C G Groot; K de Groot
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-04

8.  Evaluation of a silica-containing bone graft substitute in a vertebral defect model.

Authors:  Hideo Kobayashi; A Simon Turner; Howard B Seim; Teruya Kawamoto; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  The effect of the ionic products of Bioglass dissolution on human osteoblasts growth cycle in vitro.

Authors:  Jun-Ying Sun; Yu-Sheng Yang; Jipin Zhong; David C Greenspan
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.963

10.  Use of bioglass for orbital volume augmentation in enophthalmos: a rabbit model (oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  Malena M Amato; Sean M Blaydon; Frank W Scribbick; Cliff J Belden; John W Shore; Russell W Neuhaus; Patrick S Kelley; David E E Holck
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.746

View more
  7 in total

1.  The combination of mesenchymal stem cells and a bone scaffold in the treatment of vertebral body defects.

Authors:  Václav Vaněček; Karel Klíma; Aleš Kohout; René Foltán; Ondřej Jiroušek; Jiří Šedý; Jan Štulík; Eva Syková; Pavla Jendelová
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series.

Authors:  Ioannis Konstantinidis; Tarun Kumar; Udatta Kher; Panagiotis D Stanitsas; James E Hinrichs; Georgios A Kotsakis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Investigating the Effects of Surface-Initiated Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone to Bioactive Glass Particles on the Mechanical Properties of Settable Polymer/Ceramic Composites.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Catherine L Ward; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.089

Review 4.  Design and clinical application of injectable hydrogels for musculoskeletal therapy.

Authors:  Øystein Øvrebø; Giuseppe Perale; Jonathan P Wojciechowski; Cécile Echalier; Jonathan R T Jeffers; Molly M Stevens; Håvard J Haugen; Filippo Rossi
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  MagnetOs, Vitoss, and Novabone in a Multi-endpoint Study of Posterolateral Fusion: A True Fusion or Not?

Authors:  Lukas A van Dijk; Florence Barrère-de Groot; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Matthew Pelletier; Chris Christou; Joost D de Bruijn; William R Walsh
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.723

6.  Vertebral body defects treated with umbilical-cord mesenchymal stem cells combined with hydroxyapatite scaffolds: The first case report.

Authors:  Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim; Muhammad Deryl Ivansyah; Ahmad Nugroho; Rio Wikanjaya; Anissa Feby Canintika; Tri Kurniawati
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-12

Review 7.  An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.

Authors:  Takashi Taguchi; Mandi J Lopez
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.