Literature DB >> 10716290

Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical-size cancellous defects.

D L Wheeler1, E J Eschbach, R G Hoellrich, M J Montfort, D L Chamberland.   

Abstract

Bioactive glasses form a surface apatite layer in vivo that enhances the formation and attachment of bone. Sol-gel Bioglass graft material provides greater nanoscale porosity than bioactive glass (on the order of 50-200 A), greater particle surface area, and improved resorbability, while maintaining bioactivity. This study histologically and biomechanically evaluated, in a rabbit model, bone formed within critical-sized distal femoral cancellous bone defects filled with 45S5 Bioglass particulates, 77S sol-gel Bioglass, or 58S sol-gel Bioglass and compared the bone in these defects with normal, intact, untreated cancellous bone and with unfilled defects at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. All grafted defects had more bone within the area than did unfilled controls (p < 0.05). The percentage of bone within the defect was significantly greater for the 45S5 material than for the 58S or 77S material at 4 and 8 weeks (p < 0.05), yet by 12 weeks equivalent amounts of bone were observed for all materials. By 12 weeks, all grafted defects were equivalent to the normal untreated bone. The resorption of 77S and 58S particles was significantly greater than that of 45S5 particles (p < 0.05). Mechanically, the grafted defects had compressive stiffness equivalent to that of normal bone at 4 and 8 weeks. At 12 weeks, 45S5-grafted defects had significantly greater stiffness (p < 0.05). At 8 and 12 weeks, all grafted defects had significantly greater stiffness than unfilled control defects (p < 0.05). In general, the 45S5-filled defects exhibited greater early bone ingrowth than did those filled with 58S or 77S. However, by 12 weeks, the bone ingrowth in each defect was equivalent to each other and to normal bone. The 58S and 77S materials resorbed faster than the 45S5 materials. Mechanically, the compressive characteristics of all grafted defects were equivalent or greater than those of normal bone at all time points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10716290     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100180120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Bin Lu; Lei Chen; Jiang Chang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The story of Bioglass.

Authors:  Larry L Hench
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Historic and current strategies in bone tissue engineering: do we have a hope in Hench?

Authors:  Eileen Gentleman; Julia M Polak
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Stimulating bone growth in the small animal patient: Grafts and beyond!

Authors:  Greg Harasen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity of NanoFUSE(®) DBM.

Authors:  James F Kirk; Gregg Ritter; Chad Waters; Sonoko Narisawa; José Luis Millán; James D Talton
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  Medpor in maxillofacial deformities: report of three cases.

Authors:  N N Andrade; Kanchan Raikwar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-08-11

Review 7.  Bioactive Glasses: Frontiers and Challenges.

Authors:  Larry L Hench; Julian R Jones
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-11-30

8.  In-situ solvothermal processing of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical and biological performance for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Saeed Moeini; Mohammad Reza Mohammadi; Abdolreza Simchi
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 9.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07

Review 10.  Bioactive glass coatings on metallic implants for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Joy-Anne N Oliver; Yingchao Su; Xiaonan Lu; Po-Hsuen Kuo; Jincheng Du; Donghui Zhu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2019-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.