Literature DB >> 19235208

Evaluation of a silica-containing bone graft substitute in a vertebral defect model.

Hideo Kobayashi1, A Simon Turner, Howard B Seim, Teruya Kawamoto, Thomas W Bauer.   

Abstract

Orthopedic and spine surgeons are in need of supplements or replacements for autograft. We investigated the histological properties of three formulations of Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate [calcium sodium phosphosilicate putty with or without autograft and NovaBone 45S5 Bioglass particulate (NovaBone, LLC, Jacksonville, FL)] using a sheep vertebral bone void model. Bone voids were surgically created in L3, L4, and L5 in each of 22 sheep, and the voids were filled with one of the tested biomaterials or left empty as a control. Histological evaluations were performed at either: 0, 6, or 12 weeks after surgery. Undecalcified sections were digitized, and the areas of the original defect and new bone were quantified. Decalcified sections were evaluated qualitatively. Histomorphometry showed a significant increase in the amount of bone between 6 and 12 weeks in all groups, but there was no significant difference in new bone formation among the formulations or between any formulation and the empty defects. The granules of all three formulations were associated with an inflammatory reaction. Many of the particles appear to have a hollow center, and the narrow tunnel through the center of the particles was sometimes associated with acute inflammation especially at 6 weeks. These particles were also associated with chronic inflammation at both 6 and 12 weeks, although the extent of inflammation decreased between 6 and 12 weeks. The search for the optimum bone graft substitute/extender will continue. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19235208     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of an osteostimulative putty in the sheep spine.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Bin Lu; Lei Chen; Jiang Chang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  A novel sheep vertebral bone defect model for injectable bioactive vertebral augmentation materials.

Authors:  X S Zhu; Z M Zhang; H Q Mao; D C Geng; J Zou; G L Wang; Z G Zhang; J H Wang; L Chen; H L Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Gene-modified adult stem cells regenerate vertebral bone defect in a rat model.

Authors:  Dmitriy Sheyn; Ilan Kallai; Wafa Tawackoli; Doron Cohn Yakubovich; Anthony Oh; Susan Su; Xiaoyu Da; Amir Lavi; Nadav Kimelman-Bleich; Yoram Zilberman; Ning Li; Hyun Bae; Zulma Gazit; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Osteoporosis and the Management of Spinal Degenerative Disease (I).

Authors:  Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Angel R Piñera; Luis Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  Review of Biomechanical Studies and Finite Element Modeling of Sternal Closure Using Bio-Active Adhesives.

Authors:  Amatulraheem Al-Abassi; Marcello Papini; Mark Towler
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

6.  Low Dose BMP2-Doped Calcium Phosphate Graft Promotes Bone Defect Healing in a Large Animal Model.

Authors:  Tie Liu; Wen Fang; Gang Wu; Yining Li; Janak L Pathak; Yuelian Liu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Bone healing response to a synthetic calcium sulfate/β-tricalcium phosphate graft material in a sheep vertebral body defect model.

Authors:  H L Yang; X S Zhu; L Chen; C M Chen; D C Mangham; L A Coulton; S S Aiken
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 8.  Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shu-Kui Chen; Long Li; Ling Qin; Xin-Luan Wang; Yu-Xiao Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  MagnetOs, Vitoss, and Novabone in a Multi-endpoint Study of Posterolateral Fusion: A True Fusion or Not?

Authors:  Lukas A van Dijk; Florence Barrère-de Groot; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Matthew Pelletier; Chris Christou; Joost D de Bruijn; William R Walsh
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.723

10.  Large Animal Model of Osteoporotic Defect Healing: An Alternative to Metaphyseal Defect Model.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Christoph Biehl; Deeksha Malhan; Fathi Hassan; Sameh Attia; Sebastian Rosch; Annemarie B Schäfer; Erin McMahon; Marian Kampschulte; Christian Heiss; Thaqif El Khassawna
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.