Literature DB >> 21052004

Brain stem responses to speech in younger and older adults.

Kathy R Vander Werff1, Kristen S Burns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This experiment was designed to evaluate whether neural encoding of speech features at the brain stem level is altered in the aging auditory system. In addition, the effect of minimal peripheral hearing loss on the auditory brain stem response (ABR) evoked by speech stimuli and interactions with aging were examined.
DESIGN: Speech-evoked ABRs (S-ABRs) were recorded using a synthetic 40-msec /da/ stimulus from both ears of participants in two groups: normal-hearing younger adults (n = 19) and normal-hearing older adults (n = 18). Latencies and amplitude for S-ABR peaks representing neural responses to the onset and offset of the speech syllable as well as a sustained frequency following response to the vowel content were analyzed. The role of hearing threshold differences between groups and the reduced overall stimulus level on the S-ABR were also examined. In addition, click-evoked ABRs (C-ABRs) were obtained from all participants, and age-group differences in the neural response to both types of stimuli at the brain stem level were compared.
RESULTS: S-ABR latencies, amplitudes, and sustained response mean data were obtained for younger adults and older adults. Older adults were found to have significantly smaller C-ABRs with longer latencies, despite all latencies falling within normal limits. Older adults also had significantly smaller onset and offset responses for the S-ABR, with significantly delayed offset latencies in response to this synthetic consonant-vowel syllable. Many of the C-ABR and S-ABR variables were found to significantly correlate with high-frequency audiometric thresholds, and few of the group differences remained significant when this was taken into account. The remaining significant S-ABR effects were decreased amplitude at the onset and significantly delayed offset responses in the older group. These effects were different from those of simply decreasing the overall stimulus level, which caused significant shifts in latency across the entire S-ABR.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study partially supported the hypothesis of age-related differences in neural processing of speech at the brain stem level. There were significant delays in the timing of the offset portion of the S-ABR in older listeners compared with their younger counterparts, even after accounting for the differences in peripheral hearing threshold between groups. There were also significant reductions in amplitude of the S-ABR at the onset. These results are consistent with a reduction in neural synchrony in older adults to transient components of both speech and nonspeech sounds. However, sustained components of the S-ABR, which follow the harmonic components of the syllable, showed group differences but were not significant after adjusting for peripheral hearing loss, suggesting that they may be more affected by hearing sensitivity and other peripheral changes. These results support further investigation into the ability of the aging auditory system to encode temporal cues at the brain stem level, particularly the response to speech stimulus offset and its relationship to speech perception and temporal processing abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21052004     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f534b5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  39 in total

1.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Age-related changes of auditory brainstem responses in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Xochi Navarro; James R Engle; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

6.  Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Inferior colliculus contributions to phase encoding of stop consonants in an animal model.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Daniel A Abrams; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  How early aging and environment interact in everyday listening: from brainstem to behavior through modeling.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Dorea R Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.