BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing, and outcomes-related research from diverse health care settings is needed to target appropriate efforts and interventions. We developed an electronic health record (EHR)-based CKD registry at the Cleveland Clinic and validated comorbid conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients who had at least one face-to-face outpatient encounter with a Cleveland Clinic health care provider and (1) had two estimated GFR values <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) >90 days apart as of January 1, 2005 and/or (2) were patients with International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes for kidney disease were included. RESULTS: Our registry includes 57,276 patients (53,399 patients met estimated GFR criteria and 3877 patients met ICD-9 diagnosis code criteria) as of March 2010. Mean age was 69.5 ± 13.4 years, with 55% women and 12% African Americans. Medicare is the primary insurer for more than one half of the study cohort. The κ statistics to assess the extent of agreement between the administrative dataset extracted from the EHR and actual EHR chart review showed substantial agreement (>0.80) for all conditions except for coronary artery disease and hypertension, which had moderate agreement (<0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Development of an EHR-based CKD registry is feasible in a large health system, and the comorbid conditions included in the registry are reliable. In addition to conducting research studies, such a registry could help to improve the quality of care delivered to CKD patients and complement the ongoing nationwide efforts to develop a CKD surveillance project.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing, and outcomes-related research from diverse health care settings is needed to target appropriate efforts and interventions. We developed an electronic health record (EHR)-based CKD registry at the Cleveland Clinic and validated comorbid conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients who had at least one face-to-face outpatient encounter with a Cleveland Clinic health care provider and (1) had two estimated GFR values <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) >90 days apart as of January 1, 2005 and/or (2) were patients with International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes for kidney disease were included. RESULTS: Our registry includes 57,276 patients (53,399 patients met estimated GFR criteria and 3877 patients met ICD-9 diagnosis code criteria) as of March 2010. Mean age was 69.5 ± 13.4 years, with 55% women and 12% African Americans. Medicare is the primary insurer for more than one half of the study cohort. The κ statistics to assess the extent of agreement between the administrative dataset extracted from the EHR and actual EHR chart review showed substantial agreement (>0.80) for all conditions except for coronary artery disease and hypertension, which had moderate agreement (<0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Development of an EHR-based CKD registry is feasible in a large health system, and the comorbid conditions included in the registry are reliable. In addition to conducting research studies, such a registry could help to improve the quality of care delivered to CKD patients and complement the ongoing nationwide efforts to develop a CKD surveillance project.
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Jane Marsh; Lesley A Stevens; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Rebecca Hanratty; Raymond O Estacio; L Miriam Dickinson; Vijayalaxmi Chandramouli; John F Steiner; Edward P Havranek Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2008-05
Authors: Charuhas V Thakar; Susana Arrigain; Sarah Worley; Jean-Pierre Yared; Emil P Paganini Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Shawn L Fultz; Melissa Skanderson; Larry A Mole; Neel Gandhi; Kendall Bryant; Stephen Crystal; Amy C Justice Journal: Med Care Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin; Lesley A Stevens; Jane Manzi; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Russell A Wilke; Richard L Berg; Peggy Peissig; Terrie Kitchner; Bozana Sijercic; Catherine A McCarty; Daniel J McCarty Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2007-03
Authors: Sankar D Navaneethan; Stacey E Jolly; Jesse D Schold; Susana Arrigain; Georges Nakhoul; Victoria Konig; Jennifer Hyland; Yvette K Burrucker; Priscilla Davis Dann; Barbara H Tucky; John Sharp; Joseph V Nally Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Mary Regina Boland; George Hripcsak; Yufeng Shen; Wendy K Chung; Chunhua Weng Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sankar D Navaneethan; Jesse D Schold; Stacey E Jolly; Susana Arrigain; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Joseph V Nally Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Sankar D Navaneethan; Jesse D Schold; Susana Arrigain; Stacey E Jolly; Anil Jain; Martin J Schreiber; James F Simon; Titte R Srinivas; Joseph V Nally Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Sankar D Navaneethan; Jesse D Schold; Susana Arrigain; Stacey E Jolly; Edgard Wehbe; Rupesh Raina; James F Simon; Titte R Srinivas; Anil Jain; Martin J Schreiber; Joseph V Nally Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Sankar D Navaneethan; Jesse D Schold; Susana Arrigain; Stacey E Jolly; Joseph V Nally Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Paul E Drawz; Patrick Archdeacon; Clement J McDonald; Neil R Powe; Kimberly A Smith; Jenna Norton; Desmond E Williams; Uptal D Patel; Andrew Narva Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 8.237