Literature DB >> 21050780

Dynamic acromiohumeral interval changes in baseball players during scaption exercises.

Melissa D Thompson1, Dennis Landin, Phillip A Page.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Elevation of the arm during a dynamic scaption exercise will result in a progressive narrowing of the acromiohumeral interval (AHI); however, the addition of a load will not significantly affect the AHI in healthy baseball players.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen healthy baseball players performed a seated scaption exercise from 0° to 90°, with and without a normalized additional load. Dynamic AHI intervals were measured using digital fluoroscopic videos with the arm at the side, and at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 75° of humeral elevation.
RESULTS: The mean AHI for unloaded and loaded scaption decreased significantly (P < .001) from the arm at the side (12.7 mm) until 45° (4.9 mm), further changes in the mean AHI between 45°, 60°, and 75° were not significantly different. Generally, loaded scaption resulted in smaller AHI values at 45°, 60°, and 75°; however, only the differences at 60° (P = .005) and 75° (P = .003) were significant. DISCUSSION: Narrowing of the AHI during dynamic motion was similar to previous reports of static AHI, with the exception of the trend towards widening of the AHI seen at 75° during both conditions. The additional AHI narrowing observed at 60° and 75° during the loaded exercise may indicate that scapular positioning is more influential in this range.
CONCLUSION: An additional AHI narrowing of 11% during loaded scaption, did not result in any clinical impingement during the exercise, but may have more serious implications in other healthy and pathologic populations.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050780     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  Supraspinatus tendon and subacromial space parameters measured on ultrasonographic imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Sevgi S Subasi Yesilyaprak; Amee L Seitz; Mark K Timmons; Matthew K Walsworth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Effect of glenohumeral elevation on subacromial supraspinatus compression risk during simulated reaching.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Dustin M Schlangen; Katelyn A Schneider; Jonathan Schoenecker; Andrea L Senger; William C Starr; Justin L Staker; Jutta M Ellermann; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Thickness of the Rotator Cuff Tendons at the Articular Margin: An Anatomic Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  William C Sessions; Rebekah L Lawrence; J Tyler Steubs; Paula M Ludewig; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

5.  Distribution of bone and tissue morphological properties related to subacromial space geometry in a young, healthy male population.

Authors:  Jaclyn N Chopp-Hurley; John M O'Neill; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Active Scapular Retraction and Acromiohumeral Distance at Various Degrees of Shoulder Abduction.

Authors:  Gulcan Harput; Hande Guney-Deniz; İrem Düzgün; Uğur Toprak; Lori A Michener; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Effects of Modified Posterior Shoulder Stretching Exercises on Shoulder Mobility, Pain, and Dysfunction in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Özge Tahran; Sevgi Sevi Yeşilyaprak
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Handball-specific loading acutely reduces the acromiohumeral distance in experienced handball players and in non-handball experienced athletes.

Authors:  Carolin Rentz; Kirsten Legerlotz
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-16

9.  Dynamic comparison of segmentary scapulohumeral rhythm between athletes with and without impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush; Nader Maroufi; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Shakourirad; Hamid Haghani
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 0.212

10.  Supraspinatus tendon thickness and subacromial impingement characteristics in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Tomonobu Ishigaki; Koichiro Yoshino; Motoki Hirokawa; Makoto Sugawara; Masanori Yamanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.