Literature DB >> 21050093

The use of titanium and stainless steel in fracture fixation.

J S Hayes1, R G Richards.   

Abstract

The use of metal in fracture fixation has demonstrated unrivalled success for many years owing to its high stiffness, strength, biological toleration and overall reliable function. The most prominent materials used are electropolished stainless steel and commercially pure titanium, along with the more recent emergence of titanium alloys. Despite the many differences between electropolished stainless steel and titanium, both materials provide a relatively predictable clinical outcome, and offer similar success for fulfilling the main biomechanical and biological requirements of fracture fixation despite distinctive differences in implant properties and biological responses. This article explores these differences by highlighting the limitations and advantages of both materials, and addresses how this translates to clinical success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21050093     DOI: 10.1586/erd.10.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  23 in total

1.  Negative pressure wound therapy limits downgrowth in percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Saranne J Mitchell; Sujee Jeyapalina; Francesca R Nichols; Jayant Agarwal; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Mechanical and microstructural properties of fixation systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo Breno Meneses Mendes; Raquel Correia de Medeiros; Andrezza Lauria; Érica Marchiori; Renato Sawazaki; Éder Sócrates Najar Lopes; Roger William Fernandes Moreira
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-11-13

3.  [Challenging the dogma on inferiority of stainless steel implants for fracture fixation. An end of the controversy?].

Authors:  S Weckbach; J T Losacco; J Hahnhaussen; F Gebhard; P F Stahel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Effects of cathode design parameters on in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of electrically-activated silver-based iontophoretic system.

Authors:  Zhuo Tan; Anirudh Ganapathy; Paul E Orndorff; Rohan A Shirwaiker
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Johnathan Ng; Jonathan Bernhard; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

Review 6.  [Titanium or steel as osteosynthesis material : Systematic literature search for clinical evidence].

Authors:  Alexander Joeris; Sabine Goldhahn; Elke Rometsch; Dankward Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Implant-derived magnesium induces local neuronal production of CGRP to improve bone-fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhang; Jiankun Xu; Ye Chun Ruan; Mei Kuen Yu; Micheal O'Laughlin; Helen Wise; Di Chen; Li Tian; Dufang Shi; Jiali Wang; Sihui Chen; Jian Q Feng; Dick Ho Kiu Chow; Xinhui Xie; Lizhen Zheng; Le Huang; Shuo Huang; Kwoksui Leung; Na Lu; Lan Zhao; Huafang Li; Dewei Zhao; Xia Guo; Kaiming Chan; Frank Witte; Hsiao Chang Chan; Yufeng Zheng; Ling Qin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Metal artifacts from titanium and steel screws in CT, 1.5T and 3T MR images of the tibial Pilon: a quantitative assessment in 3D.

Authors:  Shairah Radzi; Gary Cowin; Mark Robinson; Jit Pratap; Andrew Volp; Michael A Schuetz; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06

9.  Microstructural Analysis of Fractured Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Mateusz Kopec; Adam Brodecki; Grzegorz Szczęsny; Zbigniew L Kowalewski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Metallosis after using distal fibular locking plate for lateral malleolar fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung Jun Park; Gi Cheol Bae; Dae Gyu Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.