Literature DB >> 21047861

Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food.

Tom Flower1.   

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of vocal mimicry in animals, few functions for this behaviour have been shown. I propose a novel hypothesis that false mimicked alarm calls could be used deceptively to scare other species and steal their food. Studies have previously suggested that animals use their own species-specific alarm calls to steal food. However none have shown conclusively that these false alarms are deceptive, or that mimicked alarm calls are used in this manner. Here, I show that wild fork-tailed drongos (Dicrurus adsimilis) make both drongo-specific and mimicked false alarm calls when watching target species handling food, in response to which targets flee to cover abandoning their food. The drongo-specific and mimicked calls made in false alarms were structurally indistinguishable from calls made during true alarms at predators by drongos and other species. Furthermore, I demonstrate by playback experiments that two of these species, meerkats (Suricata suricatta) and pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor), are deceived by both drongo-specific and mimicked false alarm calls. These results provide the first conclusive evidence that false alarm calls are deceptive and demonstrate a novel function for vocal mimicry. This work also provides valuable insight into the benefits of deploying variable mimetic signals in deceptive communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047861      PMCID: PMC3081750          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  D W Pfennig; W R Harcombe; K S Pfennig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The evolution of mimicry: a problem in ecology and genetics.

Authors:  P M SHEPPARD
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1959

3.  Interspecific audience effects on the alarm-calling behaviour of a kleptoparasitic bird.

Authors:  Amanda R Ridley; Matthew F Child; Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R Rose; H M Wade; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Behavioural deception.

Authors:  S Semple; K McComb
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Context-dependent vocal mimicry in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eben Goodale; Sarath W Kotagama
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics.

Authors:  Brandon C Wheeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young.

Authors:  Naomi E Langmore; Sarah Hunt; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  The mimetic repertoire of the spotted bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus maculatus.

Authors:  Laura A Kelley; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-04-15

2.  Crying wolf to a predator: deceptive vocal mimicry by a bird protecting young.

Authors:  Branislav Igic; Jessica McLachlan; Inkeri Lehtinen; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Signals, cues and the nature of mimicry.

Authors:  Gabriel A Jamie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evidence for tactical concealment in a wild primate.

Authors:  Aliza le Roux; Noah Snyder-Mackler; Eila K Roberts; Jacinta C Beehner; Thore J Bergman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Importance of intraspecifically gregarious species in a tropical bird community.

Authors:  Hari Sridhar; Kartik Shanker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A 'crying wolf' game of interspecific kleptoparasitic mutualism.

Authors:  Antonio J Golubski; Nathaniel S O'Connell; Jesse A Schwartz; Sean F Ellermeyer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Interspecific signalling between mutualists: food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners.

Authors:  Bruce D Baigrie; Alex M Thompson; Tom P Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Deceptive vocal duets and multimodal display in a songbird.

Authors:  Paweł Ręk; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  How signalling games explain mimicry at many levels: from viral epidemiology to human sociology.

Authors:  William Casey; Steven E Massey; Bud Mishra
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Who do you trust? Wild birds use social knowledge to avoid being deceived.

Authors:  Filipe C R Cunha; Michael Griesser
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.