Literature DB >> 19493900

The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.

M B V Bell1, A N Radford, R Rose, H M Wade, A R Ridley.   

Abstract

In risky environments, where threats are unpredictable and the quality of information about threats is variable, all individuals face two fundamental challenges: balancing vigilance against other activities, and determining when to respond to warning signals. The solution to both is to obtain continuous estimates of background risk, enabling vigilance to be concentrated during the riskiest periods and informing about the likely cost of ignoring warnings. Human surveillance organizations routinely produce such estimates, frequently derived from indirect cues. Here we show that vigilant individuals in an animal society (the pied babbler, Turdoides bicolor) perform a similar role. We ask (i) whether, in the absence of direct predator threats, pied babbler sentinels react to indirect information associated with increased risk and whether they communicate this information to group mates; (ii) whether group mates use this information to adjust their own vigilance, and whether this influences foraging success; and (iii) whether information provided by sentinels reduces the likelihood of inappropriate responses to alarm calls. Using playback experiments, we show that: (i) sentinels reacted to indirect predator cues (in the form of heterospecific alarm calls) by giving graded surveillance calls; (ii) foragers adjusted their vigilance in reaction to changes in surveillance calls, with substantial effects on foraging success; and (iii) foragers reduced their probability of responding to alarm calls when surveillance calls indicated lowered risk. These results demonstrate that identifying attacks as they occur is only part of vigilance: equally important is continuous surveillance providing information necessary for individuals to make decisions about their own vigilance and evasive action. Moreover, they suggest that a major benefit of group living is not only the increased likelihood of detecting threats, but a marked improvement in the quality of information available to each individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19493900      PMCID: PMC2817217          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  New insights on how temporal variation in predation risk shapes prey behavior.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Modelling antipredator vigilance and flight response in group foragers when warning signals are ambiguous.

Authors:  C J Proctor; M Broom; G D Ruxton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  State-dependent sentinels: an experimental study in the Arabian babbler.

Authors:  J Wrigh; A A Maklakov; V Khazin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information.

Authors:  Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Jennifer J Templeton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency.

Authors:  Marta B Manser; Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; M J O'Riain; P N Brotherton; D Gaynor; R Kansky; A S Griffin; M Manser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Referential labelling in Diana monkeys.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Laure Verneyre; Janice C Daniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls.

Authors:  Hugo J Rainey; Klaus Zuberbühler; Peter J B Slater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  19 in total

1.  Negative feedback from maternal signals reduces false alarms by collectively signalling offspring.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hamel; Reginald B Cocroft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Bargaining babblers: vocal negotiation of cooperative behaviour in a social bird.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R A Smith; A M Thompson; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Alarm calls modulate the spatial structure of a breeding owl community.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Jesús M Avilés; Juan Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food.

Authors:  Tom Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Experimental evidence that sentinel behaviour is affected by risk.

Authors:  A R Ridley; N J Raihani; M B V Bell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Bright birds are cautious: seasonally conspicuous plumage prompts risk avoidance by male superb fairy-wrens.

Authors:  Alexandra McQueen; Annalise C Naimo; Niki Teunissen; Robert D Magrath; Kaspar Delhey; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The influence of fledgling location on adult provisioning: a test of the blackmail hypothesis.

Authors:  A M Thompson; N J Raihani; P A R Hockey; A Britton; F M Finch; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Component, group and demographic Allee effects in a cooperatively breeding bird species, the Arabian babbler (Turdoides squamiceps).

Authors:  Oded Keynan; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Amanda R Ridley; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Interspecific signalling between mutualists: food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners.

Authors:  Bruce D Baigrie; Alex M Thompson; Tom P Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.