Literature DB >> 17698446

Interspecific audience effects on the alarm-calling behaviour of a kleptoparasitic bird.

Amanda R Ridley1, Matthew F Child, Matthew B V Bell.   

Abstract

Audience effects are increasingly recognized as an important aspect of intraspecific communication. Yet despite the common occurrence of interspecific interactions and considerable evidence that individuals respond to the calls of heterospecifics, empirical evidence for interspecific audience effects on signalling behaviour is lacking. Here we present evidence of an interspecific audience effect on the alarm-calling behaviour of the kleptoparasitic fork-tailed drongo (Dicrurus adsimilis). When foraging solitarily, drongos regularly alarm at aerial predators, but rarely alarm at terrestrial predators. In contrast, when drongos are following terrestrially foraging pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) for kleptoparasitic opportunities, they consistently give alarm calls to both aerial and terrestrial predators. This change occurs despite no difference in the amount of time that drongos spend foraging terrestrially. Babblers respond to drongo alarm calls by fleeing to cover, providing drongos with opportunities to steal babbler food items by occasionally giving false alarm calls. This provides an example of an interspecific audience effect on alarm-calling behaviour that may be explained by the benefits received from audience response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698446      PMCID: PMC2391208          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  5 in total

Review 1.  Signalers and receivers in animal communication.

Authors:  Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Why animals lie: how dishonesty and belief can coexist in a signaling system.

Authors:  Jonathan T Rowell; Stephen P Ellner; H Kern Reeve
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle).

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1977-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls.

Authors:  Hugo J Rainey; Klaus Zuberbühler; Peter J B Slater
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Recruitment calling: a novel form of extended parental care in an altricial species.

Authors:  Andrew N Radford; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another?

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Benjamin J Pitcher; Janet L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food.

Authors:  Tom Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Experimental evidence that sentinel behaviour is affected by risk.

Authors:  A R Ridley; N J Raihani; M B V Bell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  A 'crying wolf' game of interspecific kleptoparasitic mutualism.

Authors:  Antonio J Golubski; Nathaniel S O'Connell; Jesse A Schwartz; Sean F Ellermeyer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The presence of an avian co-forager reduces vigilance in a cooperative mammal.

Authors:  Lynda L Sharpe; Abigail S Joustra; Michael I Cherry
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Interspecific signalling between mutualists: food-thieving drongos use a cooperative sentinel call to manipulate foraging partners.

Authors:  Bruce D Baigrie; Alex M Thompson; Tom P Flower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  To call or not to call: parents assess the vulnerability of their young before warning them about predators.

Authors:  Tonya M Haff; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Flights of fear: a mechanical wing whistle sounds the alarm in a flocking bird.

Authors:  Mae Hingee; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Pigeons integrate past knowledge across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Claudia Stephan; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.844

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.