Literature DB >> 21047736

Similar perceptual costs for dividing attention between retina- and space-centered targets in humans.

Robert Niebergall1, Lawrence Huang, Julio C Martinez-Trujillo.   

Abstract

Visual-spatial attention enhances the perception of behaviorally relevant stimuli. One issue that remains unclear is whether attention is preferentially allocated to stimuli that remain fixed in one reference frame (e.g., retina-centered), or whether it could be equally allocated to stimuli fixed in other frames. We investigated this issue by asking observers to covertly attend to sinusoidal gratings fixed in different reference frames and to discriminate changes in their orientation. First, we quantified orientation discrimination thresholds (ODTs) while subjects pursued a moving dot and either attended to a retina- or a space-centered grating. We then measured ODTs while subjects divided attention between the two gratings. We found that dividing attention proportionally increased ODTs for both target gratings relative to the focused attention condition. Second, we used the same stimulus configuration and conditions during a fixation task. Here, one grating was retina- and space-centered while the other moved in space and on the retina. Again, ODTs during divided attention proportionally increased for both gratings. These increases were similar to those measured during smooth pursuit. Our results show that humans can proportionally divide attention between targets centered in different reference frames during both smooth pursuit eye movements and fixations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21047736     DOI: 10.1167/10.12.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Spatial attention, feature-based attention, and saccades: three sides of one coin?

Authors:  James A Mazer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Psychophysical contrast calibration.

Authors:  Long To; Russell L Woods; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The coordinate system of endogenous spatial attention during smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Rinat Hilo-Merkovich; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Precision and Normative Values of a New Computerized Chart for Contrast Sensitivity Testing.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Antonio Calossi; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Piero Barboni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.